Anyone who takes credit away from a pfp guy losing to another pfp guy unless that pfp guy was kod is a clueless boxing fan.
That GGG fan must be high, then.. Murray was a good win but hardly worthy of p4p status.. Thurman and Kovalev deserve to be there, GGG does not.
Care to explain what's funny? Murray had never been KO'd in his career, like Pascal. Murray had 1 defeat and 1 draw in his 8 year pro career, Pascal had 2 defeats and 1 draw in 10 years. Murray and Pascal were both ranked high enough to be mandatories in their respective divisions. This is a prime example of how Kovalev is regarded higher than GGG(or the other way around) You can't see how close Pascal and Murray were as opponents ---> Hence you can't see how Kovalev and GGG is similar, career-wise.
Pascal was a clear threat, Murray wasn't. And Kov beat Hop. Who are you going to compare to Hop, Rubio?