Why is GGG top 10 p4p and not Kovalev?

What makes Kov less of a threat than GG? This statement was focking ree****ed lol...

 

This is where the P4P lists have a lot of holes. Some people go by resume, some people go by skill shown in fights, and some go by both. P4P lists are really dumb, honestly.

 

Oh with that said, Kovalev should be rated higher than Golovkin.

 

Golovkin seems to be sporting an iron chin

Kovalev not so much

Plus Golovkin has better skills than Kovalev

 

you know who he lost to.
he LOST 2 times in his last 5. doesnt matter, he aint in top 10 anymore much less #4

 

Seems to be? He hasn't been hit yet, and I don't remember Kov being hurt by Pascal. And to me Kov has the better skill set.

 

I'm just saying bro

I believe that Golovkin will have achieved a lot more than Kovalev by the end of their careers

 

You mean the Hopkins who's older than the FATHERS of most posters in this forum? That's just a LOL.

And by saying Pascal was a threat and Murray was not, you are simply giving credit to GGG since they were the same level opposition but one posed threat to Kovalev and other didn't to GGG.

 

He lost to two guys ranked pfp by decision and knocked out the #2 pfp guy too. You don't drop guys like that out of the top 10. People still rank Pac #2 pfp after he was ktfo for 3 minutes, why? Had any other pfp guy been knocked unconscious they would be out of the top 10. Foh