Why is GGG top 10 p4p and not Kovalev?

:yep

 

Damn, now they want to take away what Kov did to an age old albeit still good Hop AND belittle Pascal and pass of Geale and Murray as greater wins.:dead

 

Old ass Hopkins was beat by Dawson too

Wanna crown him as well?

 

so I ask again because of his age Murray was better than Hopkins p4p as a opponent, if no then again age is irrelevant

 

What does this have to do with the price of tea in China?

 

I was comparing Murray to Pascal, not Hopkins, if you read it.

 

Weren't you the guy telling everyone Murray was gonna beat GGG


Get your story straight

 

No, I was the guy "hoping" Murray would beat GG. :good

 

There's no comparison there either.

 

Lineal? ok......
Geale beat Sturm for a worthless WBA strap and he already owned the IBF strap.
Ok, Pascal has the edge as a better opponent. But not by much and hardly worth bragging about.
Would also note that KOV has better competition at 175 than GGG has at middle..... theres no one left at middle.
Cotto? never gonna fight GGG NEVER
Quillin would be a good win, he doesnt want to fight
Jermain Taylor? a good scalp but would get no credit

 

And I asked you a direct question which you have sidestepped twice now, if you wanna play the age game with Hopkins then please answer, since he was so old, older than a lot of fathers of guys who post on here I believe you said does that make Murray a better opponent because he's so must be more talented as a younger fighter

 

'Martin Murray is going to KO GG'

[url]http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=529400[/url]

:good

 

I do agree Pascals a better win than any of Golovkins, but not by much