why is hopkins a overated bum

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by mad-23, Feb 19, 2008.


  1. joekirkbycobra

    joekirkbycobra King Of The Ring Full Member

    3,966
    2
    Jan 4, 2008
    i think joe will win but it will be fkin hard for him
    bhop is no bum
     
  2. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Very true, Hopkins is no bum. He sure took care of Tarver who knocked out Roid Jones.
     
  3. dan-b

    dan-b Guest

    I first must say I think you have hit the nail on the head because this is Hopkins' main problem. The boxing fraternity at large find it hard to pinpoint his prime. With other fighters it's easier to define a period where they were at their best.

    For me his prime probably starts with Glen Johnson & ends with Trinidad. To look at this subjectively you have to forget whether you like his style or not. During this period it is difficult to refute he was the best middleweight in the world. Despite many considering him a blown up welter the Trinidad fight was a defining moment for him.

    I think in that fight the performance was important & I must say it was arguably his best. It's like when Lennox Lewis fought Tyson. No one can pretend that was the best Tyson but it will still be remembered as an important part of his career & showed a prime Lewis performing at his best in a big event. Similairly for Hopkins this was a fight against a hugely popular fighter, in a big event for the undisputed crown he craved.

    After that I think we saw the transition into the style that has seen him to this point in his career.
     
  4. Beatboxer

    Beatboxer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,937
    2
    Mar 4, 2006
    Indeed. Thanks for your thoughts.

    When discussing Hopkins I actually think you could speak about his prime in two senses: his physical prime and perhaps also a mental prime. In regards to the former, I believe this may have started as far back as the Joe Lipsey fight. Not many give Hopkins a whole lot of credit for that bout but Bernard on that night literally 'executed' the career of a highly regarded and thought of up and comer via a very tasty knockout. After that we see a string of good performances against the likes of John David Jackson, Glen Johnson, the second Echols fight and of course culminating in the Trinidad bout where he finally gained the recognition and acclaim that he deserved. During this period I believe Hopkins was physically at his peak, and the manner of his victories I believe are evident of this fact.

    Along the way however, he gained experience, fought different fighters learned different styles, always adapting. Nonetheless with the onslaught of age sure to occur, he had to adapt his style. In what I consider his 2nd career, and past physical prime but very much mental prime years, he has added a few things to his game. For example, though never an angel, he has made rule breaking within the ring almost an acceptable art form with his subtle trickery. In this second career he has managed some big name wins against the likes of Hoya, Wright and Tarver. Perhaps not as impressively or as entertainingly as Pre 2001(though the Tarver performance was excellent as was the Joppy beat down) but nonetheless he has kept winning and now finds himself a 2 weight champion. He has relied more on guile, experience and ring smarts as much as physical tools in this era because physically he isn't what he was 10 years ago. And in this chapter has managed some of his biggest wins, (Tarver in particular).

    Hopkins is indeed an enigma. To me, you have to acknowledge that whilst physically he is not what he once was, it would be doing him a disservice to say hes out of his prime right now. No. To me the man has had two primes: a physical prime and a mental prime(for want of a better word). Hopkins in my view has never had an absolute prime...he's had two. Take your pick.
     
  5. Betty Swollocks

    Betty Swollocks James 'Lights Out' Toney Full Member

    5,709
    1
    Jul 21, 2004
    Hopkins IS badly overrated these days. Basically I agree with Beatboxer. He stayed at middle fighting smaller guys and Robert Allen about 14 times. Of all the elite fighters around those weights in the 90's and early 2000 years, who did he face? Jones, and that's it. He got beat, no arguments. He never fought a whole host of top fighters.

    Iv'e no interest in this fight, Calzaghe is a twat and is also overrated. His legacy depends on what Kessler goes on to do...as Lacy was nothing to shout about....and nor was an old and weight-drained Eubank. After that, there's **** all. Too long in a comfort zone fighting stiffs.
     
  6. dan-b

    dan-b Guest

    Great post. I actually meant to mention the Joppy beatdown as an exception to the transition. I think Hopkins genuinely disliked Joppy for some reason & took pleasure in dishing out a rather severe beating.

    I find it interesting you talking about him having two primes because I could even make an argument for him never having a prime so to speak. Hopkins has had quite a unique career in many ways, infact, I think he's quite a unique guy. The mental strength & will to win stem from a deep seeded need to prove himself.

    I must make a startling confession & suggest maybe, just maybe I have let emotion cloud my judgement with this up & coming bout & it's not something I normally let happen. I think I like the Hopkins story as much as I do his fights & career. He's done things the hard way & if there were more champions like him boxing would be better off. I don't mean with his style but I mean guys who defend their unified crown with their life. He was middleweight champ, no question.

    I guess I'm hoping for a romantic send off for Hopkins with one last show of defiance in the face of indominable adversity. Personally, win or lose, I hope this is Bernards last fight. I don't need to see a much belated rematch with Jones. This would be it, the big send off. Nothing could top it.
     
  7. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Why is Hopkins a bum?

    Many reasons
     
  8. dan-b

    dan-b Guest

    Go have a black coffee.:roll:
     
  9. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    No way, blue milk and two sugars :nono
     
  10. dan-b

    dan-b Guest

    Seriously mate why have you come on this thread trying to cause a row? Are you drunk or do you crave attention?
     
  11. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    I've only had a couple of tins

    It was tongue in cheek, mainly because I thought I might get this sort of reaction

    Wind your neck in
     
  12. dan-b

    dan-b Guest

    Sad.
     
  13. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    It's more sad that after all this time you still take an obvious tongue in cheek remark seriously

    Lighten up, I can picture you conking it on your computer chair enraged by a comment on your lover Popkins. Not a good way to go
     
  14. dan-b

    dan-b Guest

    Yeah good one.
     
  15. kurt2006

    kurt2006 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,942
    2
    Mar 5, 2006
    I am beginning to warm to Bhops with his interviews, think he is quite funny.