why is hopkins no.1 on boxrec??????

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by $drew$marshall, May 7, 2009.


  1. $drew$marshall

    $drew$marshall money$$$$$$ Full Member

    668
    0
    Nov 1, 2008
    i'm confused(not trying to hate on hopkins) but they have had him at number 1 p4p even after pac destroyed oscar and hatton?:huh
     
    $drew$marshall, May 7, 2009
    $drew$marshall, May 7, 2009
    #1
  2. zarman

    zarman Guest

    i dont think its so odd to have hopkins as number 1
     
    zarman, May 7, 2009
    zarman, May 7, 2009
    #2
  3. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    we been through this so many time you dumb****, boxrec ratings are based on a computer rank system.
     
    Boom_Boom, May 7, 2009
    Boom_Boom, May 7, 2009
    #3
  4. ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS

    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS YAHHHHH Full Member

    4,115
    4
    Mar 10, 2009
    :rofl
     
    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS, May 7, 2009
    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS, May 7, 2009
    #4
  5. the_brigand

    the_brigand I'll Eat Her Later... Full Member

    3,906
    0
    Oct 2, 2008
    it's just the way the rankings get calculated, don't forget it's all based on numbers and formulas over there and Pacquiao lost a lot of rating points moving up in weight.
     
    the_brigand, May 7, 2009
    the_brigand, May 7, 2009
    #5
  6. 1Kolijn

    1Kolijn Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,514
    0
    Dec 7, 2007
    Sir Hopkins ! :happy
     
    1Kolijn, May 7, 2009
    1Kolijn, May 7, 2009
    #6
  7. rickx1

    rickx1 Legend Full Member

    3,183
    0
    Sep 16, 2008
    Calzaghe would be number 1 if he was still active because he easily beat hopkins.
     
    rickx1, May 7, 2009
    rickx1, May 7, 2009
    #7
  8. Maxime

    Maxime Sweet Science Full Member

    8,957
    109
    Jul 19, 2004
    Because the computer gave him more points then the others.

    /tread
     
    Maxime, May 7, 2009
    Maxime, May 7, 2009
    #8
  9. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    How's that list coming along?
     
    EL-MATADOR, May 7, 2009
    EL-MATADOR, May 7, 2009
    #9
  10. Ricky369

    Ricky369 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,468
    144
    Feb 16, 2008
    At least thats what they claim. I am not so sure.
     
    Ricky369, May 7, 2009
    Ricky369, May 7, 2009
    #10
  11. Stovepipe

    Stovepipe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,873
    60
    Feb 1, 2007
    boxrec ratings traditionally are pretty ******ed

    it doesn't mean anything
     
    Stovepipe, May 7, 2009
    Stovepipe, May 7, 2009
    #11