Why is Hopkins no 3 p4p on Boxrec??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by crippet, Jun 17, 2008.


  1. crippet

    crippet Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,377
    20
    Dec 1, 2007
    Why is he???

    He has lost 3 of his last 5 fights

    Audley Harrison has a better recent record than that!!
     
  2. beerto

    beerto Member Full Member

    236
    0
    Feb 26, 2008
    aside the decision loss to calzaghe, on face value alone i think many had winky wright #2 or #3 p4p before there fight regardless of weight class of the fight he won that, before that tarver which it can be disputed all day that he had weight problems but he won that, also im not sure but dont box rec use a computer ranking system so that might have something to do with it?
     
  3. box3r86

    box3r86 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,506
    1
    Feb 8, 2008
    lol. yeah but audley didnt face JT twice, winky wright, tarver or joe calzaghe.

    he faced skelton, sprott and williams etc. **** **** and ****!lol
     
  4. bmf95b

    bmf95b Boxing Fan Full Member

    5,268
    11
    Jan 9, 2007
    Well why is DelaHoya #1 at light middle?
     
  5. JCS

    JCS New Member Full Member

    8
    0
    Mar 30, 2007
    I guess the Ring is **** too.. after all, they have Hopkins #4 P4P.
     
  6. bmf95b

    bmf95b Boxing Fan Full Member

    5,268
    11
    Jan 9, 2007
    I do know that the fighters are given points based on their performance and level of opposition they have faced.
     
  7. bmf95b

    bmf95b Boxing Fan Full Member

    5,268
    11
    Jan 9, 2007
    people still continue to ride the b-hop wagon. face it he's getting old and could not continue his pace against someone who is called a SLAPPER by many folks on this site.
     
  8. Rattler

    Rattler Middle Aged Man Full Member

    3,925
    18
    Feb 9, 2005
    Because there is no proper way, mathematically or scientifically, you can properly gage the greatness that is Bernard "F'n" Hopkins. It is simply unattainable, so you must guesstimate to the best of your ability.

    OBVIOUSLY... # 3 is WAY too low; but that is the way of such things. Measuring Bernard's awesomeness by the same measure used to conduct such things for other fighters, is foolhardy and containing of little merit... but it is all that we have to work with.

    Bernard Hopkins' win/loss record is but a slice of the pie needed to correctly ascertain his true worth as a living legend... but again... this is all that they have to work with.

    Please... be patient with them, for they know not what they do. :good
     
  9. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Boxrec seems to be too stringent in the awarding of points towards fighters, and also in taking them away after a loss.

    For instance, Tim Bradley, in my opinion, beat Junior Witter 116-112, yet because one pissed up judge gives it to Witter, Bradders hardly gets any points for beating the consensus No.2 in the division!

    You also get some oddballs - for instance, Mayweather was P4P #2 with Boxrec prior to Hatton, who was #4, with Hopkins way out in front. Floyd then produces one of his best performances (2nd best IMO) yet gets no additional points, Hatton loses a boat load to drop to #12 and Hopkins remains #1 - bearing in mind his most recent win came against a beached whale!!
     
  10. BoxingGuru

    BoxingGuru Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,458
    3
    Jan 21, 2007
    If anyone would simply ready, they are computer generated rankings. Please calm down. Hopkins is crap we all know this.
     
  11. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    8
    Aug 7, 2004
    :patsch