Why Is It Everytime A Fighter Around Floyds Weight Wins A Fight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by walk with me, Dec 8, 2008.


  1. surreal deal

    surreal deal Liverpool via Krypton Full Member

    7,396
    410
    Jun 16, 2006
    which one?
     
  2. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007

    because the fact that he lost doesnt change his skill set...
    hes a brawler/boxer which decent speed & strength and the fact that margarito just beat him doesnt negate any of that... just showed one type of way that cotto can be beat...

    im not even talking about the routes of how these guys will get to floyd but hypothetically if floyd was to fight them what the result would be.....
     
  3. GoldenChild

    GoldenChild Formerly Samurai Full Member

    1,172
    0
    Sep 18, 2008
    Everyone is obsessed with floyd. They just don't want to admit it
     
  4. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    wrong. Noone except a couple of brits actually thought Hatton would move up to WW and beat Floyd. When Floyd took that fight, most people thought he should have fought Cotto instead.

    the guys who people said could beat Floyd have always been Cotto, Margarito, and PW.

    So Floyd has fought none of the guys that people were saying could bat him.


    When Hatton beat JLC, everyone said JLC was shot. Hatton was actually a big favorite to win that fight. Everyone know JLC was shot before that fight.
     
  5. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    alot of people wrote him off like hes not a monster or something.... cotto is a tough & skilled *******.. he just lost... who cares one loss doesnt mean you fell off the map...

    you ever seen any "who would you like to see floyd fight" threads.

    everyone votes for margarito as if margarito is a better skilled fighter than cotto or something.... margarito beat cotto... it doesnt make him better... margarito style is just bad news for cotto
     
  6. surreal deal

    surreal deal Liverpool via Krypton Full Member

    7,396
    410
    Jun 16, 2006
    You have paraphrased my first post.
    Which is a good thing......it means you are correct:good
     
  7. Govanmauler

    Govanmauler Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    10
    May 30, 2007

    Why because you say so ????

    ****in never learn , "this is fact becasue I think it !"

    FAIL ! :patsch


    Pac v Hatton ( leaning slightly towards Pac )

    and then pac v pbf ( leaning slightly towards Pbf )

    Now theres a top year for you
     
  8. surreal deal

    surreal deal Liverpool via Krypton Full Member

    7,396
    410
    Jun 16, 2006
    Im just constantly baffled as to why some people put 'everyone' instead of many,some,several,majority, etc etc.
    Do you realise that 'everyone'is an absolute.It means,well... everyone..
    You've done it again here at the bottom "everyone votes for Margarito" do they?no,SOME do.Many 'vote' for Cotto too.That isnt 'everyone',its some.
     
  9. surreal deal

    surreal deal Liverpool via Krypton Full Member

    7,396
    410
    Jun 16, 2006
    Will people stop saying 'everyone' FFS?I dont want that twat in my life in any way.
    Try these words instead;
    Majority
    many
    an amount
    the consensus
    several
    some.
    There isnt many opinions on here that is shared by 'everyone'
     
  10. GoldenChild

    GoldenChild Formerly Samurai Full Member

    1,172
    0
    Sep 18, 2008
    Simple mistake, go to hell.
     
  11. Govanmauler

    Govanmauler Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    10
    May 30, 2007

    for the same reason people say " This Will happen " instead of " I think this will happen"

    Arrogance !
     
  12. surreal deal

    surreal deal Liverpool via Krypton Full Member

    7,396
    410
    Jun 16, 2006
    I will,when you go to language or logic class.
    So of all the posters on here,"everyone" of them is obsessed by Floyd?
    That is ridiculous.
     
  13. BobDigi5060

    BobDigi5060 East Side MMA Full Member

    10,898
    2
    Feb 7, 2006
    Styles do make fights so if Cotto didn't have the skillset to beat the type of guy like Margarito is he really a tougher fight for Floyd? Not only was Cotto on a round by round decline before the TKO but he was losing on two of the three cards; one was a draw.

    Since Cotto got TKO'd by Margarito in a brutal fight and Margarito hasn't ever been put away I can't see how he could put up a better fight than Margarito. Not to mention after a possible rematch.

    Margarito is just a bigger, stronger, pressure fighter and Cotto's boxing wasn't his biggest asset. Cotto is going to have to come at Floyd in order to win. Cotto boxing with Mayweather? Not a chance.
     
  14. thewoo

    thewoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,769
    4
    Mar 3, 2005
    I completly disagree. There was no all of a sudden with regard to margarito. Way before there was even talk of a fight with Cotto people thought he had the tools to beat floyd. The whole 8 million offer and the floyd is ducking margo talk was going on before Cotto even moved to 147. It is a fight that has been in demand for very long time the win over Cotto simply reinforced what fans had already been saying for years.
     
  15. GoldenChild

    GoldenChild Formerly Samurai Full Member

    1,172
    0
    Sep 18, 2008
    Holy ****, move on already. :lol: