Thanks Chris, i particularly enjoyed your own lengthy post. It was probably enough for me to leave the topic on, but i felt like getting my teeth into a bit of lengthy debate involving my own era.
Larry Holmes had an excellent jab, high workrate, and solid chin. I think his personality hurt him...he deserves credit for dominating his class for so long however he fought during a weak era (not the weakest) in the heavyweight division
Why is Larry Holmes thought of so highly?..... .....Because he says whats on his mind... & if it offends you ?... SO--****IN--WHAT !
Woah, I forgot about this thread, cheers for all the replies. I have a far better understanding now. This place is top notch for info!
I think its fair to make few criticisms concerning his opponent selection, but with all due respect, Its a rather wide stretch to question his validity as a true champion.