Why is Mosley rated so high, he hasn't beaten an elite in years..

and why is Oscar rated so high?

 

So because Cotto has a loss he is no longer elite, therefore this discredits Mosley despite the fact that the decision was very controversial in manys eyes
So by your logic Tommy Hearns and Sugar Ray Leonard or Sugar Ray Robinson shouldnt be rated that high either. Right?

Lay off the crack pipe

 

By ezes standards there must only be one or two elites in the sport

 

Name!

 

Mosley lost but was not beaten, can you comprehend that?
Don't you judge a fighter mainly based on their most recent performance? If so how could you NOT rate Mosley as an elite?

 

at 36 years old he had a very close fight with one the p4p best fighters in the world......not to mention, he's one of the most skilled fighters in boxing, and on top of that, he would give anyone trouble; if not beat them....i'd say thats reason enough to consider him elite

 

Mosley is still there but he is not the same,I think it will show with Mayorga

 

atsch Your missing my thread ending point entirely
To put it in perspective take Tommy Hearns for example. After Hearns got KTFO by leonard he moved up to light middle and beat Marcos Geraldo and Jeff McCracken(clearly not elite fighters) so why was he rated so highly?
This do anything for you?

 

i dont know how.... he TKO'd vargas twice, a UD over Collazo, a close fight with Cotto and Winky Wright not to mention his win over ODLH......i'd say thats enough to be considered elite, which is why he is considered elite.....thats fights with 5 different former world champions, not to mention he's passed prime and fighter above his natural weight, it's pretty obvious he's an elite...

but on another note what does zab have to do with mosley???? matching someone for 4 rounds aint the same as matching someone for a full fight when you're a 12 round fighter is it not???....so that comparasion was no good honestly