Why is Mosley rated so high, he hasn't beaten an elite in years..

Yes.

 

We aren't talking right now, we are talking when Cotto beat Mosley. You said at that moment Cottos resume was better than Floyds at WW and he had become the man. Which it clearly wasn't.

Please tell me how a Quitana win when Cotto beat him is better than a Baldomir victory?

 

That's not the point. The point was when Cotto beat Mosley you said his resume was better and he became the man of the division with that win. Which it wasn't and he didn't.

 

The whole point of our debate was when Cotto had beat Mosley. You can't switch it up and say its about now.

 

That's what your arguement came down to. You didn't have any arguement for any other of Cottos victories topping Floyds besides Mosley and Hatton.

You're whole debate came down to how good of a Mosley victory was it, was it enough to shine over everything else? Which it clearly wasn't.



And really the debate changed a bit when I made the thread but in our convos the debate never changed and you were dying for a thread to be made because you needed help.

 

Now? Of course Cotto. That's unfair though to compare though. Who knew what any fighter would go on to do? I gaurentee no one thought Baldomir would beat Judah or Quitana would beat Williams.


When Cotto beat Mosley, his resume was not better and he did not become the man of the division.