Why is Pac rated higher than JMM at 130lbs???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Biggame, Aug 23, 2007.


  1. Biggame

    Biggame Active Member Full Member

    1,336
    0
    Mar 24, 2005
    This still baffles me!!

    Pac who has no belts, and has only fought a shell of EM at the weight is ranked higher? He's actually done nothing at the weight to warrant his ranking:nono Beating Em who was already dethroned by MAB means......

    MAB was the #1 130lber, he was dethroned by JMM therefore JMM should hold that spot! It's not Pac holds a win over him. They fought to a draw in a fight alot of Ppl feel JMM won!

    Pls anyone w/Reason explain why Pac should be ranked higher!
     
  2. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    Cause his fans intimidiate everybody, you will see in a few minutes:bbb
     
  3. Biggame

    Biggame Active Member Full Member

    1,336
    0
    Mar 24, 2005
    :rofl :rofl

    I'm waiting for them!! :bbb
     
  4. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    You mean with this?

    :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :patsch :smoke :good :good :good :good :deal :deal :hat :good
     
  5. LogDog69

    LogDog69 Active Member Full Member

    1,245
    1
    Jul 18, 2007
    I think Pac is ranked higher because he already had a knockout win over MAB before JMM beat him. Even though it happened at 126 and not 130 I figure this is probably the reason. When PAC and JMM rematch we'll find out who is #1 for sure :good
     
  6. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    :lol:
     
  7. Quick Cash

    Quick Cash Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,718
    351
    Jul 12, 2007
    Well, if you're basing it on the Barrera-Morales trilogy, then technically it breaks down to MAB eking out the decision in the rematch, losing by TKO to Manny Pacquiao shortly after, who, in turn, lost it to Erik. In Morales' next fight in 130, he lost to Pacquiao and Pacquiao hasn't lost since. Chronologically, that's what happened, but a lot of the fights above didn't occur at super featherweight. Basically, Pacquiao is rated higher because he is a much more proven commodity in the division than JMM, who has had one good performance. It boils down to dominance more than anything else, really.
     
  8. theHawtness

    theHawtness Active Member Full Member

    1,321
    0
    Apr 2, 2007
    1.pac has no belt so it means he shouldn't be no.1?:-( get outta here. those belts are worth nothing. boxing has no objective ranking regarding these belts. anyone can get them.

    2. there's no way JMM could have won that.:verysad the "JMM schooled pac after round 1" is the greatest myth in modern boxing. get outta here.

    3. he's done nothing in his weightclass to warrant his ranking?:-( for christ sake, he annahilated the 2 greatest mexican jr. lightweights of all time! he Knocked out (twice!) the guy who everybody thought can never be KOed! he pummeled barrera, humiliated him. and lastly, he always gives us one hell of a fight.

    get outta here!
     
  9. Stewbear

    Stewbear Active Member Full Member

    538
    5
    May 5, 2006
    well what has JMM done fought a fight with barrera that couldhave gone either way, while Pacman hasalready brutally destroyed a beter version of barrera
     
  10. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    3,589
    1
    Feb 24, 2005
    I guess this thread is over.
     
  11. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    JMM won 116-112 against a shot MAB while Pac dominated the entire fight and KOed MAB 4 years earlier. Until now this is JMM's 1 and only fight at 130.

    at 130 Pac lost 115-113 once and KO'd Morales twice, something even David Diaz at 135 wasn't able to come close to doing. He also demolised Solis, Larios and Valasquez easily

    JMM's only fight at 130 is a close UD win over a shot Barrera
     
  12. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    I think it's because he got to MAB first... but I don't think he should be rated as high as Marquez at 130. Morales was shot and Solis was moving up and his competition prior to the Pac fight wasn't great at all.
     
  13. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
  14. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    The question was about 130lbs.
     
  15. theHawtness

    theHawtness Active Member Full Member

    1,321
    0
    Apr 2, 2007
    ok, i stand corrected. :bbb