Why is Pacquaio considered unbeatable in many peoples eyes?

Pac is an exciting fighter which thoughtout history has lead people to over rate them...Pac is good but he isnt that good. Many of the people that think that Pac is an unstoppable beast are what you would call nuthuggers, sackswingers. Those cats arent boxing fans they are Pac fans...Thing is, its not only Pacnitic there are the Wlad huggers, Calzaghe huggers, Mayweather huggers..Guys that think those fighters cant be beat despite in the case of Pac and Wlad they have been...They excuse away loses by saying "Oh it was a bad night, or Oh that was soooo long ago that he dont count"

 

His victory over DLH was so suprising so destructive that it has led many of his fans into irrationally. Like beating Mosley lol.

I just go back and watch him getting lifted out of his shoes by JMM and that brings you back to reality. He's a great fighter, the best P4P today. But he's not invincible and he's gonna have a difficult fight against Hatton.

 

Put down the crack pipe son.

 

Nah brah....PAC is just that...."THAT GOOD". But beatable. Just b/c he's exciting doesn't mean he's over rated. In some cases being exciting would have people over rating them like Gatti. But the difference is PAC perfroms at the highest levels and he wins dominantly for the most part. He's not unstoppable but very hard to beat. By pointing out PAC being beat and not including the transformation you have got to be BLIND NOT TO SEE would indicate you either don't like PAC or you don't know your boxing. PAC in the Phillipines is NOT...and I repeat, is NOT the same PAC you see before you today. To state otherwise would be border line ******ed and to disregard that variable in the equation of measuring where PAC stands today only jacks your own answer to this equation up.

 

Pacquiao is the King right now, untill someone else proves otherwise then give him the credit he deserves.. the guys fights everybody and fights regularly, not like other champions.

 

It happens when someone beats a good fighter unexpectedly and in dominant fashion. Remember when Donald Curry beat McCrory. He was supposed to win a decision, but he knocked Milton out basically with one left hook. After that fight some people thought Curry could beat Hagler or at least give him a good fight, but Lloyd Honeyghan came along and sort of exposed him, or at least his weight problems. Hatton should be able to give Pacman a tough fight, the problem I see for Hatton is that Pacman does everything better than Hatton almost.

 

Speed kills and he has a lot of it.

He will get beat if he continues to take big fights they all do eventually.......

 

Everyone ????

Don't generalize my friend . . . be careful :yep

 

he is beatable...but he is unbeatable in a trilogy

 

Manny Pacquiao is far from unbeatable, and I actually think Marquez, along with Morales, defeated him. It's all well and good to live by what the judges say because Manny is involved, the hero of Boxing today, but once they get a decision wrong in other fights, we're all on their backs. The truth is, just because the judges said Manny beat Marquez in their second fight, doesnt actually mean he did. We all have our own opinions, all of which should be respected.

 

atsch

 

:rofl:rofl:bart

 

delusional hater!

where's your boy margocheato?! :yep

 

:good