Why is Pacquiao ducking Kell Brook?

Regardless of whether you meant for it to be or not. But it is funny, so you definitely succeeded.

 

Such a weak and pointless joke I thought it was serious!

I don't get it. Why is it funny?

 

Brook? Who's he? A country singer?

 

Just checked Brook's record. Its awful. He's never faced an undefeated opponent and most of them have really lopsided records.

How are guys like Peter Buckley 31-189(losses)-10 and Brian Coleman 24-139(losses)-7 allowed to continue boxing? It can't be good for them.

According to box rec Buckley is now 32-256-12. He's losing to no hopers more than 20 times a year!!!

Is this a record number of losses? Are guys like this bad for boxing? (Theres lots of young fighters on his record, so I understand his role as experience for new talent, however....256 losses!!!)

(By the way; I finally get this thread!)

 

DKD, just FYI....you have 10 minutes to edit your posts before it shows that you've edited them, just leave the reason blank (I edit the hell out of my posts, that's why I mention it). If you already knew this, disregard.

 

I didnt know.

Thanks for being helpful.

 

I like this thread,

By the way I think Brook has a very good future in boxing , but needs to earns his strips. Beating Mike Jones first.

 

I officially challenge Manny "Pacman" Pacquiao.

I'll eat his ****ing unborn children and set fire to his house.

 

You really are a class act.

 

Pac is ducking the Klitschko brothers. Why do you think Pac is going back down to ww after the fight against Margarito? Pac wants to drain them Klitschko brothers.

 

I pride myself on my gentlemanly behaviour both in and out the ring.

 

Pac should gun for history and pursue belts at 160lb and over.

 

Now that's funny. :rofl

 

because he doesn't know who he is

 

Don't make me stab you.