Why is Roberto Duran top 10 all time P4P material?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by China_hand_Joe, Sep 22, 2007.


  1. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    35,478
    10,468
    Jan 6, 2007
    Leonard was in peak shape and well prepared, no off-day there. He didn't employ the best of strategy, but that doesn't make it an off day.


    Now, in Leonard- Duran 2, Roberto definitely DID have an off-day.
     
  2. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    73
    Nov 20, 2006
    :D
     
  3. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    73
    Nov 20, 2006
    Excellent post, there's nothing that immediately springs to mind which could be added to this. Well done. :good
     
  4. Street Lethal

    Street Lethal Active Member Full Member

    986
    30
    Jul 10, 2007
    This not even close to a logical argument. You went through all this so that you could write this piece of nonsense?
     
  5. Street Lethal

    Street Lethal Active Member Full Member

    986
    30
    Jul 10, 2007
    I agree. But a lot of people want to argue that it was a close fight. They were so shocked to see a lightweight outclass the second coming of Ali that they had to invent a fable.
     
  6. mightyd40

    mightyd40 Spartan Full Member

    2,264
    13
    Mar 21, 2007
    this is my feeling as well.....hes great but i personally dont consider him top 10....maybe close but not top 10
     
  7. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    17,596
    13,028
    Jun 30, 2005
    And isn't it coincidental that two of the four best fighters of the 80's just happened to "fight the wrong fight" against Duran when he was focused and at the top of his game? :think
     
  8. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    169
    Jul 23, 2004
    Well we could dissect each of those fights all night long. I'm pressuming the other fight you care to mention was Duran's win over Leonard in Montreal. What happened, happened. If Leonard boxed on that particular night we'll never know if he'd have won. He did adjust during the rematch, but Duran wasn't the same fighter. So where does the arguement end?.

    Well, the reason Hagler was pushed the entire distance wasn't just because he fought the wrong fight, but also part of the reason was he had a very good ring general in front of him. Duran's strategy fooled Hagler, so lets give him some credit. If Duran decided to trade power punches with Hagler from the opening bell, would Hagler have won?. Maybe, maybe not. Whatever anyone thinks, it's an opinion at the end of the day.

    The only part from below that can be questioned of being factual, were they in their primes. I think so.

    Duran beat a prime Leonard.

    And Duran took a prime Hagler the distance.
     
  9. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    17,596
    13,028
    Jun 30, 2005
    My point was that both Hagler and Leonard supposedly "fought the wrong fight" against Duran (in part at least) because Duran made them fight the wrong fight.
     
  10. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    169
    Jul 23, 2004
    Yeah, I knew where you were coming from. Agreed.

    However, there is a difference. Leonard came into the fight with Duran and fought exactly the way he expected, unlike Hagler who thought he was in for a war. Leonard addressed the press and said he'd stand flat foooted and beat Duran at his own game. Leonard knew what to expect from Duran that night.

    The Hagler fight is slightly different, as everyone expected Duran to come forward aggressively, and he done the opposite. Many people picked Hagler to KO Duran based on how they expected Duran to fight, which was aggressively, thus playing right into physically stronger Hagler's hands.