Why is Terrence Crawford not fighting at 147?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Legend, Jun 22, 2016.


  1. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,187
    5,402
    May 22, 2011

    You ain't never had a clue about nothing concerning boxing or boxers :lol::lol:
     
  2. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    147
    Mar 7, 2010
    So it is it an advantage (big) or a disadvantage (weight-drained)?

    I'll answer. If he loses, he was weight-drained. If we wins, he was "huge" for the weight and had an unfair advantage.

    If he goes to welterweight, he could be in with Kell Brook, Thurman, Porter. Oh no, now he's undersized. Should he go back down to 140?

    No! DonnyMo, thinks he's too big for 140, so he has to go up to 147 and fight Kell Brook, who if he happens beat, was weight-drained.
     
  3. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,048
    24,027
    Feb 19, 2007
    cause hes busy whoopin up dudes at 140. i think he should work on a smart plan for moving into 147, while he firmly establishes himself as the daddy of 140lb division. let the welters sort themselves out and target the weakest champion available for your first fight there. i think that by the end of next year, the welterwight division will have separated the hype from the truth and he will know which fight makes most sense.
     
  4. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,248
    38,021
    Aug 28, 2012
    He's definitely bigger than Thurman and Porter, although I think Brook is bigger than him.
     
  5. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    147
    Mar 7, 2010
    Crawford is bigger than Thurman and Porter?

    Crawford fought at 132 in the amateurs. Porter at 165. Thurman at 152.

    Does that tell you anything?
     
  6. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    That awkward kid that hit ****rty early in middle school.
     
  7. Lazar

    Lazar Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,114
    4,280
    Mar 3, 2016
    Because he can make 140lbs.
     
  8. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    [emoji38]
     
  9. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    Pretty much how it works with these nut cases.
     
  10. Richmondpete

    Richmondpete Real fighters do road work Full Member

    7,140
    5,026
    Oct 22, 2015
    He's just a kid and he's already moved up. He's definitely going to eventually be competing at 147 in the future so what's the big deal?
     
  11. RingKing75

    RingKing75 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,037
    5,148
    Dec 23, 2013
    Completely disagree with you. He just moved up to 140 and has business to handle at that weight. I think he should look to move to WW by the end of 2017.
     
  12. KiwiMan

    KiwiMan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,404
    14,596
    Feb 28, 2016
    Amazing that people still want to criticize Crawford vs Postol, which is an excellent matchup.
     
  13. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    The hell? Postol is a world beater, he is a world class operator and a champion.

    Crawford makes 140, why on earth would he move when he has a chance to unify the division and become a star?
     
  14. KiwiMan

    KiwiMan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,404
    14,596
    Feb 28, 2016
    Yep. Plenty of other GGG fans been chipping in on this thread, all defending Crawford against this remarkable complaint.
     
  15. bcr

    bcr Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,563
    1,440
    Dec 21, 2013
    Because he is an 140 fighter?

    He was lightweight not much time ago, you can't jump divisions like that, see what happened to Broner.