why is there an excuse for every floyd win

Wow, Floyd beat an impressive combined record of 80-16-6!!

The only impressive fight that Floyd has won over the past 3 years is Ricky Hatton, due to the undefeated record!!

 

you keep bringing up records also...margarita had a good amount of losses probably more than judah.... so you think pbf shouldnt have fought the undisputed champ?? that was a step toward unifying which you were complaining about...what exactly is your argument??

 

Look, if Floyd decides to take on another undefeated fighter, I will give him a lot more credit. But, he won't do it!! He is a coward that doesn't take risks...he makes B Hop look like a prince and he is bad representative of the sport!!

 

what does being undefeated have to do with anything??atsch

so if he was to fight berto instead of mosley you would give him credit??:huh ...who in that division has beat undefeated fighters...first you question his opposition at 140 and get owned then you argue he has never unify and get shut down now you say he has to fight undefeated fighters..why??

 

Yes...Yes...the best opposition consists of fighters that don't know how to lose!! When are you people going to get it?? Take a page from the book of other Champions in other weight classes!! Follow the lead from Klitschko, Pavlik, Calzaghe...real Champions!! Fight Cotto or shut up and relinquish that strap!!

 

Records actually matter in boxing...why do you think people keep track of wins and losses?

 

stupidest **** i ever heard of...just because your undefeated doesnt mean your good or the best...so by your dumb ass logic pbf would get more credit for fightting undefeated fighters like chavez jr and berto than fighting mosley or cintron because they are not undefeatedatsch

 

becuase its a statistic.....you can fight nobodies ypur whole career but until you fight top competition your record means nothing

 

Not necessarily those fighters, but they would be a lot more impressive than fighters coming off of a loss or fighters who have more than 4 losses, which seem to be the fighters that Floyd targets!!

 

margarito has more than 4 L's....Mosley has 5...so he would get no credit for beating them...the only undefeated fighter who has earned a shot is cotto....who else by your logic deserves a shot??

 

Floyd is coming off of his best year of the past 4 years by beating a higher quality of opposition. The quality of opposition should be the determining factor in chosing fights, not a meaningless strap owned by a fighter whose record has more than 5 ten losses( Baldomir)!!

 

I've already stated that the obvious candidates would be Cotto and Williams, which won't happen because Mayflower is a coward that doesn't take risks!!

 

baldomir was the ****ing undisputed champ what dont you understand

 

an undisputed champion that had been owned by 10 guys before Mayflower!!

 

the cotto fight hasnt been signed yet so how is he ducking him??...when cotto was at 140 he wasnt ready..then his 1st fight at 147 was in dec 2006 by that time pbf just beat the 2 last undisputed champs...williams was a nobody at the time...cotto then foguht urkal...was pbf ducking him then??...then cotto fought judah while pbf was fighting dlh..was pbf ducking cotto then??...then cotto signed to fight mosley before hatton vs pbf was made...was he ducking cotto then??.......pbf just fought 2 weeks ago do you think the fight with cotto should be signed already??


after you answer all of those questions you will realize your argument holds no weight