why is winky still top p4p?

You know nobody is in top #10 pvp to the end of his live.
There are other guys who deserve to be at this list because their
recent accomplishments are better than getting draws and loses.

To be at the top of the world best list require to be active and wins all the time.
I don't get it, how can anyone be top 10 boxer in the world if he is drawing and losing his fights.

NOBODY IS REMOVING him from P4P list, he just drops outside top 10.
On my list he is around # 15.

 

You shouldn't get pts, even if robbed, nor close fights - its ridiculous.

 

Because pound-for-pound 'rankings' are meaningless

 

What isn't then?

 

And yet its the measuring system that most go by.

 

a loss is a loss...should make way for people who wins! dont think he should still be there too..maybe top 15 right now

 

To some people he was top 3 - he shouldn't move so far down. Some people still feels he lost to an elite.

 

Its not like winky got blowed out by hopkins or taylor, both of them were close fights that could of gone either way. Winky is way more deserving of a top 10 spot then roy jones who hasnt beaten anyone good in 4 or 5 years and has been beaten badly when he has thought better than C+ oppenents like johnson and tarver again.

 

i dunno...i still think he hasnt proven he can win in a long time, i wouldnt say he got beaten up badly but still he lost, and P4P is about winning your fights and not losing it in a heroic effort.

 

I totally agree.

 

I like Winky, but there have been too many other guys winning that deserve a top 10 P4P ranking. It's not fair to punish them because Winky has been "not winning" impressively.

Plus, if he wins his next fight against a name guy, it's not like people wouldn't jack him right back up the rankings. I'd like to see Wright vs Abraham myself.

 

Exactly. He was the champ at 154 and then moved up to fight the champs of the next two higher weight classes and fought very well against them. Not some lame "belt holders", but the legit champs at those weights. If that's not PFP then what the hell does PFP mean?

 

I dont think thats a right assesment.
So if Floyd were to lose to Hatton, that would just automatically propel him to #15 or somewhere around there on the p4p list for 1 L. After he has been winning for years?

Winky has been doing his thing 4 the past couple of years. Arguably the best 154 pounder to lace up gloves.
He beat Shane 2x's
Beat Tito
I had him winnning the Vargas fight but thats neither here nor there. he moved up drawed with the middleweight champion. And I thought he won that fight by the way but for the record its a draw. he beat a good fighter in Ike Quartey
He lost to an ATG in Bernard Hopkins, to just move him all the way down to #15 isnt to right.

the definition of p4p I thought was based on a skill factor
"It is often said to have been created to describe world

This content is protected

and

This content is protected

champion

This content is protected

.

This content is protected

Robinson is one of the most accomplished fighter of the modern era, but his supporters realized that, while he could beat anyone in his own class, as a Middleweight he would not be able to beat a top

This content is protected

. Hence, Robinson was called the pound-for-pound best without being expected to beat much larger fighters, under the belief that he as a Middleweight was still a better quality fighter than any fighter fighting at heavier or lighter weights than him."

So if we go by that defintion, there isnt to many people that would have been higher than #15 that can beat him. So droppin him 2 #15 isnt right

 

Your delusional.

Now as for the original question.

He beat Mosely twice....then beat Tito by shutout....then beat a tough fighter in Solimon...then drew with Taylor....then beat Quartey convincingly....then lost a close fight with Hopkins.

So, 5 of his last 7 fights have been vs top10 p4p fighters and in those he is 5-1-1.

THAT is why.