Why is Wlad beating all his competition?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Stinky gloves, Mar 1, 2010.


  1. Brutalwayz

    Brutalwayz Active Member Full Member

    1,178
    2
    Feb 12, 2010
    Yea lets not count a fat and shot Rahman :lol:
     
  2. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    Wlad's chin is garbage, but unlike before. It's well protected with the help of Steward in his corner. He truly is one of the hardest heavyweights to land a telling blow on. The only way to beat him is from the inside out, you got to get into Wlad's head. Challenge him, just like Peter did. Remember when Wlad landed straight right after straight right on Peter's head. All Peter did was shake his head and go back on the attack.

    The way to beat Wlad is excessive pressure.
     
  3. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,119
    10,530
    Jul 28, 2009
    :deal
     
  4. Brutalwayz

    Brutalwayz Active Member Full Member

    1,178
    2
    Feb 12, 2010
    If only Mayorga was a HW:lol:
     
  5. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    Honestly I don't see much talent, BTW How can Wlad be champ when his Bro has the WBC and Haye has the WBA Title?
     
  6. war4years

    war4years Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,107
    0
    Aug 21, 2004
    because he is MUCH bigger than everyone else.
     
  7. Brutalwayz

    Brutalwayz Active Member Full Member

    1,178
    2
    Feb 12, 2010
    yep thats how i see it.
     
  8. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    Wlad would just have his brother fight him instead.
     
  9. Brutalwayz

    Brutalwayz Active Member Full Member

    1,178
    2
    Feb 12, 2010
    Lmfao yea thats something else that bothers me. Its like if one beats someone than the other doesn't have to fight them. And why can't they fight each other?
     
  10. BoxingFanNo1

    BoxingFanNo1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,867
    13
    Jan 20, 2009
    Can only go by what rings rankings tell me TG.
     
  11. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    Ring's rankings ain't worth **** than, 3 guys have a belt, there is no champ. Tyson would've never stood for this type of BS when he was champ.
     
  12. BoxingFanNo1

    BoxingFanNo1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,867
    13
    Jan 20, 2009
    I dislike them as much as the next guy.
    Which other universally recognised boxing ranking system from the last few years would you like me to use?
    Will the level of competition be any greater?:think
     
  13. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    No because boxing is ****ed up, it was bad enough we had 3 titles, but than Dela Homo had to come along and nearly singlehandedly give the WBOGUS a leg to stand on, now you have the ring giving out its own shitty title, the IBHOF needs to step in and recognize 1 Belt per weight class, that would eliminate a lot of ducking as well.
     
  14. Brutalwayz

    Brutalwayz Active Member Full Member

    1,178
    2
    Feb 12, 2010
    This will only help if they make mandatory matches between title holders to clear up who the belt truly belongs to.
     
  15. BoxingFanNo1

    BoxingFanNo1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,867
    13
    Jan 20, 2009
    I liked the 3 belt system.

    Something about two champions, a great unification bout, it adds something to a fight, adds meaning.

    I only use ring because it's the only source material we have as a P4P basis, sure a lot of it is **** but if you're smart enough you'll see through it.