No they aren't. Povetkin beats all of them. They were not very good technically. Bad defense, looping punches, etc.
Kiltschko did beat Thomson as world champ Thomson beat price as a 16 fight novice in first major fight blg diffrence. Kiltschko has you say fought the best the division has to offer and that's the thing the HW division has been and is the weakest in its history whilst Vlads been champ like I said before fighting a load of has beens and no hopers for years in your backyard guys like I said before who would not make spar partners for holyfield foreman Tyson etc .little wonder that vlads made loads of defences the fighters he has beaten are all no hopers has beens or blown up cruiser weights hardly impressive.
tpyical kliturd response, "one klitschko victim beats all of them past guys", a massive sweeping generalisation to hide behind. come out from hiding when you've allowed yourself to escape false generalisations.
thats reversing the truth of ageing. another typical point from planet K, where all the physical rules of the universe are reversed in order to argue wlad is better than he is.
wlad was still dominating better than holmes did, but with 3 losses to journeymen. yup, kliturdology knows no bounds.
On longevity alone, he also beat a lot of good fighters not great but good. We can like or dislike his style but he is damn good!
Bernard Hopkins: "Kids, drugs are bad.They are bad for the brain. They make you delusional." I perfectly understand what he meant now.
so.... all people in UK are curry munchers and delusional. more sweeping generalisations undermine any point the kliturd had. like a good kliturd does.
whats the salient point then - being curry munchuing, or being from planet UK? because lets look at that now - people much curry all over the world, even on planet K. but are the brits all over the world and on planet k?? NO...so clearly you meant to emphasise the brit factor, and are now backing down from that. and then you compound your error by trying to pretend the OP is mistaken....