Why is Wlad picking such poor fighters?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jack, Aug 4, 2011.


  1. blacktopbully

    blacktopbully Boxing Addict banned

    4,703
    1
    May 2, 2011
    who should wlad fight jack?
     
  2. blacktopbully

    blacktopbully Boxing Addict banned

    4,703
    1
    May 2, 2011
    i asked him if it's such apoor division why doesn't he try out and rack up some wins

    i haven't got an answer just as i won't get an answer when i asked him who is he supposed to fight
     
  3. Sp_Immortal

    Sp_Immortal Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,566
    0
    Apr 22, 2006
    Povetkin has already dropped out against Wlad 3 separate times. Wlad's not going to give him the time of day and with good reason - Povetkin will never get in the ring with him.

    Helenius is too green. Most of the top contenders are just waiting for the Klitchko's to retire, quite frankly. It's a holding pattern 'til then.
     
  4. pirao666

    pirao666 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,327
    2
    Jun 18, 2011
    Pretty sure McCline was in the top 50 (probably higher) when Arreola fought him. Travis Walker and Chazz Witherspoon too.
     
  5. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    You forgot to mention Haye
     
  6. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    68
    Mar 11, 2006
    He should wait to see who wins and fight any of Chagaev, Helenius, Lyakovich or Povetkin. Even the loser of those two fights is better, and would destroy, Wach but obviously the most impressive winner would be the best choice.

    The division is weak, yes. All four of those names are poor choices but they are the best choice. Nobody can match Wlad but he should try to fight the best available. Wach is not the best available.

    Like I said though, nobody can criticise Wlad yet. It's not signed do he shouldn't be criticised. However, I, like all boxing fans, should be hoping it doesn't happen.
     
  7. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    68
    Mar 11, 2006
    Haye would get beaten again, yes, but he's a better choice. Chambers would be beaten again but he's better than Wach. Pretty much every recent opponent, including shot Rahman, would beat Wach.
     
  8. pirao666

    pirao666 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,327
    2
    Jun 18, 2011
    I have to agree (somewhat) with Jack for once. It's true the division is almost cleaned up, but I rather see Wlad against Dimitrenko or Mormeck than Wach, Wach hasn't beaten a decent fighter in all his career.
     
  9. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    Did he broke up with Hayden? Whos is his new girlfriend then?
     
  10. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    LOL Bente just said that Klitschkos never offered Wasch a fight. They want him to beat a few more big names and establish himself more.

    /end thread.
     
  11. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    A slick african american fighter.
     
  12. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    Laila Ali?
     
  13. BoxingDomain

    BoxingDomain Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,701
    17
    Nov 21, 2008
    That's interesting.....the news came from Wach's camp.
    It was even posted on his promotional company website.
    According to Wach's camp, Finkel asked if they would be
    interested in a November fight, if Wladimir's #1 option (I'm
    guessing this is Arreola) doesn't work out.

    But, you are correct. According to Dan Rafael, Boente said
    they aren't looking at Wach.
     
  14. BoxingFan2010

    BoxingFan2010 Boxing Addict banned

    6,055
    1
    Jul 10, 2010
    Excellent point :good
     
  15. Bubby

    Bubby Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,564
    3
    Sep 14, 2010
    Well, looks like Wladimir is not fighting Wach after all. So Jack made a fool of himself (Again) for nothing.........