Why is Wladimir Klitschko So Overrated?

So what.

Vitali's opposition is not as good.

 

Oh do **** off, Wlad has beat around 30 chaps that were better than a 40 year old clown like Harrsion.

 

Wlad because his competition is better but there probably isn't a lot between them as neither has had top competition and top wins. I also don't buy into that crap about Vitali winning any events either.

 

Not even the Lewis fight?

 

if the two brothers fought i would pick vitali to win.In fact i would pick vitali to beat more great classic hw's then wladmir

 

Vitali is considered a all time great champion - by alot of boxing "experts"

Wlad is not.

 

apart from ali what hw has.

 

You're talking ****, FLINT. Sorry mush.

Beeston, I wouldn't rate Wlad in the top 20 myself. He has had a good run and adapted his style to make himself formidable etc etc but there are Heavies with better wins/attributes/runs out there.

I wouldn't rate him too highly H2H either. Bar the tiny Heavies and maybe Ken Norton, I can't imagine Wlad faring too well in any other division other than this.

Same goes for Vitali in terms of other eras. He's awkward and pretty tough (how many times has his chin been tested other than Lennox though? And how many punchers has he actually faced? He's not the iron chinned monster most make him out to be IMO) Winning 'events' is not in my criteria when it comes to ranking

 

I know you're joking...

 

C'mon everyone knows Vitali EVT6 Lewis.

 

Eh?