Why isn’t Porter considered p4p number 1 while Canelo is?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by FastSmith7, Dec 17, 2019.


  1. FastSmith7

    FastSmith7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,461
    9,592
    Sep 16, 2017
    Some people on here have Canelo as their number 1. Why?
    What is the difference between Canelo and Porter? Canelo is more marketable.

    If Porter was marketable his record would be 34-0 now. Looking at it closer, every single “defeat” that Porter suffered could convincigly be argued in his favor.
    Imo he beat both Thurman and Spence and just lost to Brook. Canelo lost to Lara more convincingly than Porter did to Brook, Canelo was beaten far more convincingly by GGG in both fights as well.

    So now lets say Canelo wasn’t marketable... he would have 4 defeats on his record at the least, would he then be considered P4P number 1? Would Porter be number 1 if in his 3 defeats, a different set of judges was hired?
     
  2. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,245
    15,066
    Dec 6, 2008
    I think Thurman clearly won.
     
  3. PH1882

    PH1882 Member Full Member

    145
    99
    Feb 14, 2019
    Look at Canelo' resume, that's why he's number 1.
     
  4. FastSmith7

    FastSmith7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,461
    9,592
    Sep 16, 2017
    Lost to GGG twice, arguably Lost to Trout, lost to May, arguably to Jacobs, lost to Lara and beat Kovalev who had like 2 months of prep.
     
  5. Pakkuman

    Pakkuman I'm not hot. I'm just BIG. banned Full Member

    7,672
    9,381
    Jun 26, 2019
    Only a handful of Mexican chicks have Clenelo as P4P #1.
     
    Juan carlos and Dangerwood84 like this.
  6. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Porter has never fought as well as Canelo did v an elite fighter in the form of GGG who is 2x the fighter that Spence is.
     
    22JM likes this.
  7. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    He`s far better P4P than Porter, Canelo would have destroyed Brook.
     
  8. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Canelo toyed with Jacobs.
     
  9. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Loma is far better than Canelo.
     
  10. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Thurman`s crap.
     
  11. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    Actually, he didn't toy with him. Won a hard fight. No bologna hyperbole today, k Mark?
     
  12. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Canelo is on a diffderent planet to Jacobs, Kovalev would have destroyed Jacobs.
     
  13. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    Mark, this has NOTHING to do with me telling you Canelo v Jacobs was closer than you give it credit. There was no "toying" with anyone. What you believe Kov does w/ Jacobs is moot to this.
     
  14. 22JM

    22JM Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,452
    3,928
    Sep 10, 2016
    Lmfao this forum is becoming a joke, You seriously can't tell the difference in skills???
     
    RacingBeat and Nopporn like this.
  15. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,267
    1,736
    Jan 4, 2007
    Porter the number 1 P4P? You must be kidding. man.....