Why isnt David Price considered as boring?

I'm not debating opposition between the two,I'm just putting it out there that if Price landed flush on Charr he'd have him out cold.

 

And what has Charr proved exactly?One of his best wins is over an utterly shot Danny Williams.
Airich was a good win but come off it,Price has fought the better guys.

 

People dont understand that a Chin AND Power are very important in this division! Price seems to have no chin at all! And maybe he can knock out people on British level or old Heavyweights but I would be not so sure if he can do it against real contenders! Now they say Thompson is a good test... Thompson looked worse wich each year passing! He looked really bad in his last fight with Wladimir! So why fighting such an old guy?

 

I dont say that Charr proved more.... I just said that I can imagin Charr winning against Price! Also I want that Price starts fighting real contenders not the fighters like he did!
And at the end of the day Charr was in the ring with one of the best Heavyweights today (wich Vitali still is despite his age) and he was just very unlucky in this fight! More than Price can say about himself.
Price is a good Boxer! But he really needs to start soon to show the World that he can beat a good contender till now he did not show it.

 

A completely shot Danny dominated Charr until the rubbish stoppage as well.

 

1. Better PR - He's young and KOs all before him lately.

2. Late stoppage.