Why isn't Wlad P4P #1?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by v2k987, Oct 16, 2012.


  1. vnyc

    vnyc Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,078
    638
    Nov 8, 2009
    because he's not as skilled as money may ,pac or ward.
     
  2. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,108
    10,523
    Jul 28, 2009
    Green: But, they do? :blood
    Blue: But, it isn't? :blood:blood
     
  3. MattMattMatt

    MattMattMatt Guest

    Exactly. It makes me laugh when I read people spouting that crap.
     
  4. luke

    luke Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,360
    9
    May 7, 2012
    Wlds lbs are not better than anyone elses he just has more of them. A 6'6 250lb martinez would break wlad in half
     
  5. luke

    luke Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,360
    9
    May 7, 2012
    100% true

    Forever in vitalis shadow
     
  6. miketysonko

    miketysonko Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,371
    317
    Dec 29, 2006
    :rofl

    Stop drinking
     
  7. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,713
    4,402
    Dec 5, 2010
    How do you block people's posts?

    I am sick of reading this guys posts.
     
  8. Mordechai

    Mordechai Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,263
    1,303
    Jun 18, 2008
    On my personal list he has the number 3 spot. Ward beat besides froch only mediocre fighters. And froch is just a very tough guy with above average skills. Dawson was weight drained. Wlad beat imo better guys then ward. And he does it for a decade. I take haye, chagaev, Ibragimov, Byrd and peter above everyone on ward's resume skill level wise.

    1. Floyd
    2. Pac
    3. Wlad
    4. Donaire
    5. Ward
    6. Martinez
    7. Moreno
    8. Gamboa
    9. Bradley
    10. Vitali
     
  9. theboss

    theboss Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,030
    3
    Jul 3, 2011
    LL was never as dominant and never held the tile for as long ect . Hope this helps . PS And LL had alot more talant in the lower weigt classes during his stint .
     
  10. theboss

    theboss Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,030
    3
    Jul 3, 2011
    But he knocks more oponents out ? He gets hit less ? He has barly lost a round in 8 years due to his boxing skill ? So he is both a power puncher and a fantastic boxer ? So do these guys do better exactly ? Just sayn
    :yep
     
  11. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,713
    4,402
    Dec 5, 2010
    Marquez above Wlad is a ****ing joke.
     
  12. 626181071

    626181071 Dan Full Member

    170
    0
    Jul 18, 2012
    Exactly! Its a pound for pound list. Can everyone say definitively, that a Wlad at 6' 3", 210 lb would be as dominant? Would anyone HONESTLY say if he were that size, he would beat Haye again?
     
  13. v2k987

    v2k987 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,257
    1
    Apr 11, 2008
    If Wlad was smaller then he would have developed a different boxing style. The argument is stupid. Haye has to use what skills he has (being the faster and more agile guy) and Wlad has to use his size and reach. It is no good asking 'if everyone was the same size' because fighters would fight differently depending on their physical assets.
     
  14. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,142
    27,871
    Jan 18, 2010
    Look what he had to beat in his last 5 fights :think

    An overweight American Cruiserweight.
    A recycled Nigerian who he, his brother and that overweight CW already beat.
    A British CW turned used car salesman.
    A 40 year old French CW who had no business being HW.
    A 40 year old recycled American HW who he already KO'd previously.

    Does this look like a list a P4P#1 would have... :blood