Why Kell Brook deserves more respect than Floyd Mayweather

Take away the ABC chain with Alexander; Maidana's resume shits on Porter's.

...and he would smack him silly h2h, even giving up size.

 

Fine, brook vs maidana then

 

Excellent fight.

 

Brook does NOT deserve more Respect than Mayweather at all .

Mayweather has accomplished a lot more .

Please Lets not be silly .

 

I'm British and I do like Brook but even I can admit this thread is ridiculous

 

Brook doesn't deserve shyt.

Porter was robbed.

 

So it took Kell Brook this long in his career to still be behind the accomplishments that Mayweather had at the end of 1998 when he was like 22 years old...?

Good win over Porter, though.

Agree that Maidana > Porter.

 

Please stop it .

It was not even close to a robbery .

Porter looked bad and deserved to lose . Brook was clearly the better man .

 

All fair points.

 

i think the op was referring to their last respective fights (brook-porter, mayweather-maidana ii).

 

Hell no. Porter is good, but not that good. He had to rematch an aging Julio Diaz. Regarding Mayweather, just about anyone gets more respect than him. Been more of a diva than boxer in recent years.

 

Porter was a better win in terms of where Brook is in his career. Porter had a fair amount of hype behind him. And Brook was not really known here in the states. It was a good upset win for Brook. And it was the fight both guys needed, at this point.

For Mayweather it wouldn't mean much more than the Maidana win. In fact, it would probably mean less, as Maidana has been in with better fighters. Floyd has lapped these young fighters in his long career.

 

:deal

 

Terrible thread.