Why Lennox Lewis is no all-time great

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by london2k, Jul 10, 2010.


  1. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,630
    655
    Oct 17, 2009

    don't get all defensive and sarcastic, i'm just trying to understand where your coming from and find out what is your criteria for judging the greatest heavyweights of all time.

    so why do you think that joe frazier is the 5th greatest heavyweight of all time and don't think lennox lewis is in the top 10? on what criteria do you make that judgement?
     
  2. Little Pea

    Little Pea 'A' grade boxing fan Full Member

    11,750
    1
    Dec 7, 2007
    1. Never saw the rule that says that if you've been koed, you can't be an ATG.

    2. Lewis struggled against an ATG (and still beat him) so he can't be an ATG...wow funny.

    Is that all you got?
     
  3. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    The level of opposition, the era in which they boxed, their skill, their will, their willingness to put on a show.

    There are a lot of things. Resume is a gigantic part of how I judge boxers.
    As evidence in my hatred of floyd mayweather and my apathy towards guys like Jones jr.
     
  4. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    :lol: this thread is ridiculous. Lewis was more than an exceptional HW and beat all comers. His fight with Mercer was a close one, but Lewis won that one. He could box and go toe to toe. He was past his prime and no he didn't look that great vs. Vitali, but you can also say why didn't Vitali put him away then? Some of Lennox's wins were impressive, others not, but point is he beat them all and he beat the best of his era. You can't say that about too many fighters nowadays.
     
  5. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,630
    655
    Oct 17, 2009

    just out of interest, what would you consider joe fraziers 6 best victories?
     
  6. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    6 best victories?

    Well, you're talking to a guy who thinks the thrilla in manila is the greatest HW fight in history, so he gets points for even losing that one.

    Ali
    Quarry
    Foster
    Ellis (I)
    Quarry
    Mathis
     
  7. The_President

    The_President Boxing Addict banned

    6,126
    1
    Apr 22, 2010
    The thread starter has no idea of what he's talking about. Holyfield was a great champion, much greater than either Klitscho sister.

    Lennox Lewis was a good champion and never ducked anyone. His defense wasn't the best and he paid the price for his lapse a couple of times, but to his credit he bounced back and avenged both losses.
    Compared to the Klitscho sisters, Lewis faced much stiffer opposition, two to three times the quality of the bums the Klit girls are facing.
    If Lewis is not considered as a candidate for AT greatness, that makes the Klit girls merely contenders who in the face of no meaningful opposition, are just lucky to be champions.
     
  8. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    What are Lennox Lewis' top 6 wins?
     
  9. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,630
    655
    Oct 17, 2009

    i'd list an order of this top 20 from lewis' career, though i obviously understand that the holyfield draw was not a win, although we all know lewis dominated holyfield convincingly in that fight.


    1 holyfield draw
    2 holyfield win
    3 galota
    4 klitchsko
    5 tyson
    6 mercer
    7 tua
    8 grant
    9 rahman 2
    10 tucker
    11 ruddock
    12 mavrovic
    13 bruno
    14 morrison
    15 mccall
    16 briggs
    17 gary mason
    18 akinwande
    19 botha
    20 jackson




    although it can't be counted, i think one of lewis' best wins was against riddick bowe in the olympic final.
     
  10. diamondDave

    diamondDave Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,264
    11
    Jul 21, 2004


    Sorry but I have to disagree. Lewis had an era in heavyweight division.

    current-Klitschkos
    Lewis
    Holyfield
    Tyson
    Holmes
    Ali
    etc.

    He has to be in the top ten in terms of accomplishments especially unifiying the belts. So what if he struggled with Holyfield. There is no shame in that, he still won one of those fights. Further what does it matter whether you get knocked out by one punch or a dozen? If anything getting starched by one punch could be a sign of a minor defensive lapse whereas getting beat on and worn down shows that a fighter is getting out classed.
     
  11. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,866
    3,117
    Apr 16, 2005
    That;s true. He's greater than Lewis too. You never saw Holyfield taken out early by second rate fighters when he held the title.

    What the thread starter said about Lewis's advantages in his fights over Holyfield is right on, though. Holyfield was old, and considerably smaller. And yet, he still arguably should have gotten the decision in the second fight. In fact, quite a few ringside journalists scored for him.
     
  12. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    Okay, half of those wins are guys who aren't even names in their own house.
    -Bruno is a good win, but tyson killed him twice.
    -Mccall is a good win because he stopped lennox, and that shouldn't have happened.
    -Holyfield are both legit good wins, even if the draw robbery was claimed.
    -Mercer beat him.
    -Rahman was never elite. Lewis should have never lost the first fight.
    -Tua was never elite, and was nowhere capable of dealing with Lewis' size and reach, let alone boxing skills.
    -Tyson was way past it.
    -Briggs is a joke who got a gift vs 46 year old george foreman.
    -He was losing the vitali fight, was in horrible shape for it, and lucked out that the cut was so bad.
    -Golota win was excellent.

    All that considered, he is still a very talented, excellent heavyweight.
    But I hold him in less regards than the likes of holmes/frazier/foreman/Ali.

    You take a good amateur career, back it up with a massive 6'4" frame and 80+" of reach, and you have a HW champion capable of beating anyone.

    He was very good, just not in my top 10.

    I know a lot of people think he is top 10 material, but I don't think he should have lost any fight he was matched in.

    You don't have to agree with me, I'm skeptical of a lot of claims to greatness.
     
  13. sir axeman

    sir axeman Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,307
    159
    Jun 24, 2007

    Be interested to see how you rate Foreman, Tyson, Frazier. If you look at their resume..well the record books say beyond doubt that Lennox Lewis IS AN ATG Heavyweight champion.
     
  14. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,152
    10,580
    Jul 28, 2009

    I've never known Luke to be sarcastic, I think he's doing it strictly out of malice toward you and insecurity of his own position.
     
  15. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,630
    655
    Oct 17, 2009


    ali - fantastic win and 2 other close defeats

    quarry - fought very good competition but was a very limited fighter imo, lost 9, drew 6

    foster - great light heavy but gave frazier 21 lbs and never beat anyone worthy of note at heavyweight

    ellis - again fought good competition but already had 5 losses before frazier beat him

    mathis - mathis beat no one of note before frazier then lost to every decent heavyweight he fought after



    i know my assessment is a little bias to prove a point but i just don't see how any would could rate frazier above lennox lewis.

    frazier has the best single win and fought the odds with his small size but lewis' resume is way deeper. i don't believe in making excuses for fighters just because they were small, you are what you are and lewis was a better heavyweight than frazier imo.