Why no questions about Frazier not giving Ali a rematch ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Stevie G, Dec 15, 2010.


  1. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,880
    8,028
    Jul 17, 2009
    Quite often,the point gets raised about Muhammad Ali not giving George Foreman a rematch before George lost to Jimmy Young. And not without justification. What puzzles me though,is why the same question is n't asked about Joe Frazier not giving Ali a return in between the Fight of the Century,and losing his title to Foreman in 1973. Now,as I implied,George fully deserved a rematch with Muhammad,but Muhammad had earned one with Joe even more. Why ? Two reasons. Firstly,in FOTC and The Rumble In The Jungle,both victories were decisive,but which losing combatant gave the victor the CLOSER fight ? Obviously Ali to Frazier. The second reason is that between FOTC,and when Joe lost his title to George,Muhammad went 9 - 0 against Ellis,Mathis,Blin,Foster M,Chuvalo,Quarry,Lewis,Patterson and Foster B. All this while Joe was defending his title against Terry Daniels and Ron Stander. Between losing to Ali and Jimmy Young,George went 5 - 0 versus Lyle,Frazier,Le Doux,Dennis,and Agusto. Impressive,but not as much as Ali's resume. I emphasise that I'm not knocking Joe or anyone else,Frazier was as much of a warrior as Muhammad was,but it just seems strange that while Muhammad gets flack for this,Joe does n't. ???
     
    Bokaj likes this.
  2. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,880
    8,028
    Jul 17, 2009
    Late 1972 would have been perfect for Ali - Frazier 2.
     
  3. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    43
    Nov 18, 2010
    Stevie G,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Good question.

    But Joe Frazier wanted to try the 'entertainment industry' first.
    Remember 'Smokin Joe's Musical Revue'

    They were signed for a U.S. Tour, and in Europe too, during late 1971 and 1972.
    Joe even cut an album with an 11-piece group.
    They were re-named 'Smokin Joe and the Knockouts'

    Joe also went to Vietnam to entertain the troops on a U.S.O. tour.

    Muhammad Ali was aked to go with Joe and visit the troops to help boost morale,
    but Ali had better things to do, he had the important fight with Mac Foster in Japan, AH SO!
     
  4. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,364
    1,031
    Sep 5, 2004

    Good thread. Ali beat some quality fighters and he worked his way back into title contention, one thing though is that time heals all wounds.

    After all, Ali eventually got a rematch against Joe (albeit not for the title) but they fought twice after the FOTC. Nobody expected Joe Frazier to lose to George Foreman, he was a live underdog but Joe was still expected to wear him down and stop him. Additionally, had Frazier beaten Foreman, Ali-Frazier II would have come off shortly afterwards.

    With Ali vs Foreman II it's different because:

    1. The perception was that Foreman was going to be champion for a long time given his performances against Frazier and Norton; he was expected to handily beat Ali as opposed to a close fight that Ali-Frazier would have been expected to be even prior to the FOTC. Losing in Zaire was a testament to Ali's greatness but he beat Foreman fair in square and there are some that thought that he may not be able to replicate the win, as a result the question still lingered.

    2. A rematch never came off, period. It's one thing for a rematch to come off 2-3 years after; it never came off period. So the cries for a rematch seem to resonate a little more.
     
  5. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,553
    Nov 24, 2005
    Ali didn't help himself by going around saying he'd been robbed in the first fight.

    The real factor was money. The first fight had made mega millions and both fighters knew that their $2.5 million purses had left plenty to spare for the promoters when the accounts were settled. So Frazier priced himself at $5 million, and Ali said he wouldn't fight for less than $6 million ! :lol:

    Also, there was legal controversy over who held the rights to promote a rematch. Apparently Jack Kent Cooke, who had promoted the first fight, had the absolute rights to promote a rematch, some versions reckoned his contract to do so was only for 2 years. Either way, it covers the whole period in question. Cooke obviously couldn't agree terms with the fighters.

    Another thing, Ali was making contradictory statements around the time, as was Frazier, about wanting the rematch or first wanting "a few more warm-ups".

    Let's not be naive. Ali wasn't fighting all those guys on his "uncrowned champion tour" because Frazier wouldn't fight him. It was Ali cashing in, making himself some good dough in far less demanding fights. Obviously, him and his managers knew that a Frazier fight was a risk, and two losses to Frazier would be the end of the Ali legend, so it was great business sense to fight a load of retreads and routine contenders before settling matters with Smokin' Joe again.
    Ali was getting $250,000 - $500,000 + for guys like Jimmy Ellis, Buster Mathis, Bob Foster, Mac Foster and Jurgen Blin. Easy fights.
     
    bboyrei likes this.
  6. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,364
    1,031
    Sep 5, 2004
    I guess your reasons are far better than my rationale.

    But I still stand by the fact that Frazier didn't get flak because the rematches happened anyway.
     
  7. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    43
    Nov 18, 2010
    Unforgiven,

    After the Frazier-Ali fight in March 1971, Joe Frazier made more money with his
    'Smokin Joe Musical Revue' than Ali did in his fights with Ellis, Mathis and Blin.

    Joe had some lucrative contracts appearing in Europe.
    5-shows; Tuesday thru Saturday, and (2) on Sundays.

    The next Sammy Davis Jr., or so he thought.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,069
    27,896
    Jun 2, 2006


    All of who were light years better than unrated Daniels and Stander

    Frazier flat out avoided Ali , because he got him when he was coming back from 3 1/2years of inactivity and with only 18 ring rounds under his belt and still got put in the hospital for a week. A less ring rusty Ali, put matters straight in their other two fights.
     
  9. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    43
    Nov 18, 2010
    Joe Frazier took on Ron Stander and Terry Daniels, because their fight fee
    was minimal.
    Remember these fights were on 'free' National TV.

    It was smart business, to get Joe exposure in the early part of 1972.
    Joe went on that 'musical revue' schtick gig soon thereafter.
     
  10. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,553
    Nov 24, 2005
    Yes, and that explains the same thing from Frazier's side. Both were capable of making money with easy fights. And Frazier was suddenly worth a lot of money for "personal appearances" and his revue band, and whatever else he was doing with his new-found super-stardom.


    Frazier and Ali both demanded HUGE purses for a rematch, and meanwhile they made very good money doing far easier things. It's all about the dough.
    Obviously they both knew a rematch could spell defeat for either one of them.
     
  11. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    43
    Nov 18, 2010
    UnForgiven,

    Joe Frazier worked off a small-budget for those (2) TV Title defenses.

    Ron Stander got $100,000
    Terry Daniels got $75,000
     
  12. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,826
    12,497
    Jan 4, 2008
    Frazier opted for two of the worst defences in HW champion history instead of rematching Ali. When he finally took on a ranked contender he skipped Ali again and faced Foreman instead. During these years Ali was the one fighting like the champion, taking on top contenders Ellis and Quarry along with several fringe contenders like MacFoster, Lewis, Patterson, Bugner etc.

    Frazier's reign is certainly among the worst.
     
  13. swede_dreams

    swede_dreams Member Full Member

    375
    1
    Apr 11, 2010
    I would say he didnt earn a rematch at once cause he wasnt champion when he lost to Frazier.
     
    bboyrei likes this.
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,069
    27,896
    Jun 2, 2006
    The difference being that Ali was fighting rated contenders.

    Ali wanted a rematch all most immediately.
    He basically tried to force Frazier into fighting him.
    Read contemporary magazines of the time, Ali was calling Frazier out every day.
     
  15. Chaney

    Chaney Mystery and Imagination Full Member

    518
    9
    Sep 20, 2006
    Frazier should have retired from the ring after FOTC. Overall, his legacy and definitely his health was damaged after this point.

    It would have been perfect timing for him, and saved him some hellacious beatings from Foreman and from Ali in Manilla. They must have contributed to his poor health today.

    Not to mention his timely retirement leaving a stain on Ali's record (who he hated) and denying him a chance to avenge it.

    Joe physically declined after FOTC. He was never the same after it. It wasn't just how violent their encounter was...a big part of the reason that Joe was in the hospital for so long afterwards was underlying health problems. (High blood pressure? Also his vision was seriously deteriorating).

    As has been pointed out, money was a part of the reason for a delay with the rematch. But also Ali had treated Joe very badly, and was a sore loser, so Joe was in no big hurry to help Ali by giving him another title shot.
     
    bboyrei and swagdelfadeel like this.