Why nobody likes Tim Bradley

unfortunately hypocrisy is too stronk when it comes to peoples favourite fighters

 

:rofl
Love the way you defined hate for the haters:thumbsup
:smoke

 

the horrible robbery and him revealing himself as a man with no integrity , his refusal to admit he lost to Manny is pretty much the reason most people dislike him .

If he had admit his defeat , he would have been seen as an honorable man and would have been praised .

 

Admit defeat having probably taken 5 of 12 fair & square and not being a conscientious observer in order to keep a running tally RBR while he was, you know, a little busy competing in what honestly was close action throughout?

OK. Yeah. What a dick. :roll:

 

And This is coming from a poster that chokes and gags and spits on Floyds dickk whenever a thread is created with his name on it .

You truly believe Floyd Mayweather is GOD .

Mayweather beats Arthur Abraham at 160.
Mayweather beats Trout easy.
Mayweather beats Prime Cotto
Mayweather beats Prime Marg
Mayweather beats Pac easy
Mayweather beats Williams

All the retarted **** thats come out of your mouth . You will never be taken seriously by anyone on here .

 

He can't admit defeat, this is his career/life/job we're talking about here. How many fighters, especially ones with 0 losses, admitted defeat after a gift decision?

 

That's because he does beat most of the names listed. And if the Cotto fight is any indication, he probably doesn't lose that many rounds in the process.

Just because you think Floyd sucks doesn't mean that he actually does, and to be honest, a post like this will cause you to not be taken seriously by most reasonable posters on this site.. :deal

 

good post. No one admits defeat win they get the win. Look at BHOP he won't admit defeat ever, he gets knocked out and says he was robbed. That is the name of the game. Boxer's careers are based on their records, they can't admit they lost a fight they won, Even when it is obvious to everyone.
The Pac fight was close, so not a robbery just Bradley got lucky, just like Pac got lucky twice with JMM.

 

Pacquiao didn't get lucky with JMM, those fights were all close and could have gone either way. Same can be said about Morales/Barrera(except for the third fight). Bradley got a gift and is holding on to it to further resume his career/life/job and I can't blame him for that. Anyone that believes he won or claims it was close is deluded. At least Bradley does it for obvious reasons.

 

:blood You're putting half that **** in my mouth. The other half is common sense.

Margarito and Pacquiao, whether you think he ducked them or not, would have been gift-wrapped stylistically for Mayweather.

I think I've expounded at length about prime Cotto being a threat and the closest to a real duck affecting Mayweather's legacy.

Williams, I merely said wasn't ducked as their welter campaigns' timing didn't work out.

I said he beats Trout, never called it easy work.

Mayweather vs. Abraham? When did that get discussed in a serious manner here?

 

i was dissapointed in how he handled himself after the pac fight. i didnt expect him to admit he lost but all his **** talk made him appear much smaller in my eyes.

 

What **** talk?

Can you cite examples of what he said that was so out of order?

 

OMG what a **** talker.

Quick, everybody say how much you despise him for that.