Why not 65% for winner and 35% for loser on the Pac and PBF fight?

That idea is far too logical for boxing to adopt.

 

he already is viewed as a coward:hey but yeah i agree, this fight should push thru, and it think Pac will get the bigger purse being the reason for PBF's return.

 

I said this a long time ago.
But then again it goes with my name here.

Boxing isn't about winning or loosing.
It is about generating dollars. This means the best don't fight the best or that the so called best even come to fight, per say.

I remember when the older Judah fought
Johnson in a $10K match. Since it was such little money they agreed that the winner take it all. Well Johnson won clearly but this was when Zab was big money so they gave it to his brother/cousin (whomever it is) BUT that Judah split the $ with him because he knew he lost. DAMN can you believe that.
Would split the money but took the win. Still more than I can say for 99% of fighters out there who stroke their ego's more than their D!s.

 

in a perfect world, that's how boxing should be. however, at this stage that is highly unlikely. a more feasible scenario is that they both agree on a split of the purse, say 50-50, then the winner gets a bigger cut at the ppv sales

 

NOT even THE RING writers agreed of PBF having at least 1% more share than Pac.

 

40 - 40 Then the winner takes the remaining 20