Why not a much more accurate Hair Test for Pac???

Negotiations broke down when Ellerbe requested pubic hair from both fighters.

 

It's been brought up before, but that totally blows the *****s head off and they got nothing.

 

im no doc, but i am pretty sure that kind of test is not very fats. it can check for drug use in the past, but not in the immediate past. if it would work, then sure, go fir it, but there is a reason that none of the major doping agencies use it.

 

LOL

seriously though, how about a source where it says hair test are bettter than blood tests for finding peds, seems like wada and the usada wouldnt be drawing blood if all they needed was hair

 

they gave hair samples. floyd backed down when ellerbes hair was found with his.

 

Blatantly false. Cycling has been using hair testing for years now. That's right, the strictest doping regime in the world.

 

:rofl

 

Because both fighters are supposed to undergo the same tests. Seeing as Floyd is bald that wouldn't work. Besides, a hair test would require not only a strand, but a full lock around a cm in diameter and a couple of inches long.

If Pac offers to get a hair test done on top of the proposed blood testing, that would be great.

 

:rofl

 

you may be right, as i said, i'm not doc....but do you have a source to back up your claim?

 

giving hair would make pacquiao weak. why do you think he only gets a haircut every other year?

 

http://www.trimegalabs.co.uk/questions/hair-drug-testing-explained.php

Seems fool proof to me they train for 8 weeks so an inch and a half would be fine!