Why NOT for a FIGHT of THIS MAGNITUDE...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ps9teacher, Nov 18, 2009.


  1. ps9teacher

    ps9teacher Member Full Member

    461
    0
    Jul 26, 2008
    These 2 Pacman and PBF, do a 70-30 SPLIT where the WINNER TAKES the LARGER PURSE ?? It makes sense to me. If it's as even as analysts are calling it, why not ?? They both have BIG names and they are both draws in their own right. Is there anything wrong with this logic?
     
  2. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    why not 50/50??? it makes more sense!
     
  3. ps9teacher

    ps9teacher Member Full Member

    461
    0
    Jul 26, 2008
    I just think that it would be great for Boxing! Think of this scenario: Arum comes into negotiations and says I want a 65-35 split in my favor. PBF's camp says ok, only if you win!! But if I win I get the split! This would cut through all the hassle of negotiations. Winner take all!
     
  4. xxxterra

    xxxterra LURKER Full Member

    34
    0
    Mar 14, 2008
    50/50 would make more sense, but that would be hard to negotiate looking at the both greedy camps.

    However, in my own dreamworld, winner takes all (only by KO, unlimited rounds) would be nice to see.