Why not Thurman vs Porter now?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bluebird, Aug 25, 2014.


Page 3 of 3
  1. shoe

    shoe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,560
    564
    Dec 2, 2013
    porter sucks. thurman vs brook.
     
    shoe, Aug 25, 2014
    shoe, Aug 25, 2014
    #31
  2. Ol' Bub

    Ol' Bub Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,213
    758
    Feb 28, 2012
    Porter doesn't need 2 losses in a row.
    Eddie Hearn is not going risk the big money Brook v Khan fight by putting Brook in with Thurman.
    Don't expect anyone dangerous for Khan's fight on Dec. 6th either. Too much money in Brook v Khan in the UK to risk it.
    I would've picked Thurman to beat Porter or Brook before they fought each other, and nothing has changed for me.
    I'd pick Thurman to put his fist through the back of Khan's skull.
     
    Ol' Bub, Aug 25, 2014
    Ol' Bub, Aug 25, 2014
    #32
  3. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,802
    Sep 10, 2013
    It's so much more amusing since it's American's right?
     
    alexthegreatmc, Aug 25, 2014
    alexthegreatmc, Aug 25, 2014
    #33
  4. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,130
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    He would be 30 before he gets a title shot at this rate?, are you serious or just another ******ed troll?. He's 25 years old and already fought the likes of Karass, Diaz, Chaves and Quintana.
     
    Scar, Aug 25, 2014
    Scar, Aug 25, 2014
    #34
Page 3 of 3