Why Pacquiao-Campbell is the best fight out there

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Ared, Jul 20, 2008.


  1. PacDbest

    PacDbest Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,181
    1
    May 7, 2006
    Campbell for legacy??? Campbell is not even a Legend!!! If Pac beats him, all these Pachaters will just downgrade Campbell. They tell you he's not Lineal & not a true Champ. Let these lightweight eliminate each other first while Pac will be Busy Cleaning up legends in DLH & Hatton. Whoever comes on top at 135, I sure Pac will give them a Chance for a Payday.
     
  2. Sandmanl337

    Sandmanl337 Pactard Full Member

    6,647
    0
    Apr 6, 2008
    I'm not saying Campbell is a legend, but the fact that Pac can unify the 135lb division which would improve his ATG status vastly.. Campbell already holds three of the titles and Pac just won the WBC title from Diaz.. It's the style of the fight that also gets me, with two warriors and would hold nothing back.. I agree there will always be haters, but most people are asking for Pac vs Campbell and if they were to say different if Pac did beat Campbell, well then I would just have to bring up old posts.. However, I don't think the fight will be made right now.. But like I said, if Pac does indeed take the fight against DLH, I wish him the best of luck and I'll be with him every step of the way..
     
  3. Haye

    Haye Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,928
    2
    Oct 11, 2007
    So you would rather see a shameless money grabbing circus act (Not to mention seeing your own god get beat up, though in your mind boggling delusion you will only believe it when you see it, if even then) then a historical LW superfight with all 4 belts on the line?

    And people wonder what's wrong with boxing.:-(
     
  4. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    Can someone explain why Juan Diaz never got a rematch Vs. Campbell?

    Did he not have a rematch clause?
    Or did he just plain not want any more of Campbell?
    Or is it politic's?
     
  5. Haye

    Haye Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,928
    2
    Oct 11, 2007
    Pac should finish his career at LW. In one fight he can unify all 4 belts, which is one helluva start. And there are loads of great fights there, Guzman (who would beat Pac) Casamayor, Diaz, Khan, Katsidis.....

    Maybe fight Hatton for a payday, But at LWW there is nobody else to fight, WW is simply too much for Pac, and it just happens to be deeper than the Atlantic, so LW is where he should stay.
     
  6. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    to me right now the Campbell fight means more than both ODLH or Hatton which are just big names but nothing more
     
  7. PacDbest

    PacDbest Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,181
    1
    May 7, 2006
    JMM unify the 126 belts but Pac is the recognized Champ there because of the barrera win. Pac makes his Millions and Legacy beating MAB & EM without those Titles. Do you think Pac's wins over Sasakul, JMM & Ledwaba has more weight than his wins over MAB & EM???

    Pac will try the impossible by beating DLH. Pac beating DLH by KO will increase his legacy exponentially. He'll better PBF,Trinidad & Mosley wins over DLH and that means a lot. Pac dominating every rd against DLH will better what Bhop did. This is all Possible because of Pac's Speed advantage over DLH.

    Pac is trying to be The Henry Armstrong & the SRR of today. He's not settling just to hunt titles. That will come after he's finished with the legends.
     
  8. onepunch.net

    onepunch.net Active Member Full Member

    1,314
    0
    Mar 7, 2007

    There was no rematch clause, but we let Team Diaz know that they could have a rematch anytime they wanted it. Willie Savannah said there would never be a rematch as long as we are with King. And since we will most likely be with King for the remainder of Nate's career, a Diaz rematch ever taking place is unlikely.
     
  9. Sandmanl337

    Sandmanl337 Pactard Full Member

    6,647
    0
    Apr 6, 2008
    It wouldn't be the fact that he's racking up titles, but he's unifying the division which no asian has ever done? I mean he already won a lightweight title which was a first as well.. Beating Morales & Barrera were "THE" guys then when Pac beat them so of course it enhanced his legacy, but Campbell is also the man at 135 with all those titles, despite him losing to the likes of Peden.. I will say this, I have no problem with your views whatsoever nor have I hated on you.. I actually like you (and voted for you in the amsterdam poll in the mijares/donaire fight bet) and if you so happen to be right about this DLH fight, I'll never doubt a word you'll say.. Like I said, I'm with Pac every step of the way..
     
  10. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    47,435
    14,555
    Mar 5, 2006
    who cares about belts and legacy..go for the money
     
  11. Haye

    Haye Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,928
    2
    Oct 11, 2007
    There is so much delusional bull**** crammed into that post it is a wonder it did not explode.

    To be more specific, read between the first and last sentences.
     
  12. Undisputed P4P

    Undisputed P4P esb FBL & FIFA 12 champ Full Member

    3,368
    1
    Apr 24, 2008
    no one will mention nate campbell's name once guzman is finished with him.
     
  13. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    :lol:

    QFT
     
  14. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    You are talking of the business side of boxing. People are talking about the entertainment value.

    Then what? Pac will retire after getting the biggest purse of his career just like PBF? Then what about boxing as a sport? The true meaning of being a pound for pound fighter? The stature?
     
  15. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    THX for the Tip bro.
    Appreciated.