Why Pacquiao is the Greatest of All Time. Explained.

And people on here think there was a need to make a 'Most biased group of fans in the sport today?' thread atsch

 

Pac: 10-division champ

Morales: No division champ.

**** off. atsch

 

God there's some f'n ******s on here

Especially Marshmallow or whatever his name is :rofl

 

What's this got to do with Morales you stupid cumstain :blood what next? randomly mentioning Ricardo Lopez maybe? or maybe you can mention Riddick Bowe atsch

Like I said, get Pacs foreskin of your eyelids you thick ****.

 

you left out Hearns in hof beaten, and also Hearns beat better guys than Manny ever did. The guys Manny beat are not solid hof.s Cotto,Hatton were not great, and Mosley and Oscar washed up.

 

Hatton aint a HOF, neither is Cotto, & Margarito????? why would you do that? you should replace that w/ Mosley

 

I'm a ****** for saying floyd has a better resume than pacquiao?

Some friggin so-called "boxing fans" here in esb i believe.

 

So by that reasoning, both Sven Ottke and Joe Calzaghe rank higher than Roy Jones junior and SRR ?


Get the **** outta here !

 

It isn't that which makes you a ******; it is damn near everything else you say. Your stupidity will always be impressive.

 

Being undefeated means no one beat you, it does not mean you fought the best. It's ****ing easy really.

 

He's working towards being the greatest. Time will tell.

 

That poster is the biggest wanker of all time. Search his posts, it makes for a fun read.

 

I dont think he is the greatest or even top 20

but that is not an insult at all

just the fact that he is in the same sentence as the other greats of all time is enough to be proud of and he is not through yet

if he were to beat Martinez and claim the middleweight championship his stock atleast for me would go way way up

 

those other sports you've named have jumped in popularity and radically changed their training methods and technique....boxing was far more popular back in the days of SRR, most popular sport on the planet with literally a hundred times more participants and people vying to be the next great champ and the training methods/techniques have changed very little since then. boxing in the 30's, 40's, 50's was better than boxing is now, most other sports have gained popularity or different mehtods since then, boxing remains the same methodically and has dropped immensly in popularity. meaning less people working their ass off to be champ of the world using the same techniques as they did in back in the golden eras equalling a weaker era.

 

Flawed logic. That wasn't the point stupid. Mayweather rates higher than Pacquiao, Calzaghe or Roy Jones because of the stiffer opposition he beat. Fact. Go back to school.