Why punch output doesn't mean ***

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Sebastien, Apr 15, 2008.


  1. Sebastien

    Sebastien Active Member Full Member

    889
    0
    Jul 18, 2007
    Yes... but he knew that taking a bomb in order to land 4-5 punches was a good investment...

    Problem is when you're getting countered and you're not able to hit the other guy. This is when fighters become self-conscious vs. Bernard.

    Calzaghe will not be landing much in there, and that's going to be a new situation for him.
     
  2. Fat Joe

    Fat Joe Let's have it right Full Member

    6,255
    0
    Feb 12, 2008
    Keep trying to convince yourself
     
  3. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,537
    16,011
    Jul 19, 2004
    Maybe NOT?
    :lol:
     
  4. Sebastien

    Sebastien Active Member Full Member

    889
    0
    Jul 18, 2007
    I've been convinced for a long time about the outcome of this one.

    This is why I bet my presence on this discussion board on a Hopkins victory.
     
  5. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,537
    16,011
    Jul 19, 2004
    This is another oft-repeated myth from the Calzaghe faithful which undermines the fact that the punches which hurt most aren't necessarily the most powerful punches, but rather, those which are well set-up and you never see coming.
     
  6. Fat Joe

    Fat Joe Let's have it right Full Member

    6,255
    0
    Feb 12, 2008
    Often the big punches he has been hit with he hasn't seen - watch the Reid fight.
     
  7. Fat Joe

    Fat Joe Let's have it right Full Member

    6,255
    0
    Feb 12, 2008
    Oh well, nice meeting you briefly.:D
     
  8. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,537
    16,011
    Jul 19, 2004
    Just saying, two of the most frequently used arguments stemming from your typical Calzaghe fan are sheer nonsense.
     
  9. Fat Joe

    Fat Joe Let's have it right Full Member

    6,255
    0
    Feb 12, 2008
    Though it is true the one Mitchell dropped him with he didn't see coming.
     
  10. Sebastien

    Sebastien Active Member Full Member

    889
    0
    Jul 18, 2007
    He's also open body punches... given that his defense his based on upper body movement more than anything else, working the body should pay for B-Hop.
     
  11. MancMexican

    MancMexican Blood & Guts Forever Full Member

    5,152
    0
    Apr 23, 2006
    Calzaghe has a huge output against Lacy and a far reduced output against Kessler. Does Joe need a huge output to win? No.
     
  12. wayne3280

    wayne3280 Active Member Full Member

    813
    0
    Jan 12, 2008
    I hope not...I've already had one big disappointment...this ****ing thread.
     
  13. jecxbox

    jecxbox St. Brett Full Member

    7,608
    3
    Aug 5, 2007
    very interesting post man :good...I have always been feeling that Hopkins will make this a VERY hard fight for Calzaghe but somehow I felt the business of Calzaghe will win him rounds kinda like when Hopkins lost against Taylor.

    But I never thought about looking up those numbers like that, very interesting - It kinda goes to show the kind of technical master Hopkins is in the ring.
     
  14. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    I said before that work-rate will not be a significant issue in this fight. Joe's accuracy just isn't that great. He had a 28% connect rate against Kessler who stood in front of him like a ****ing robot. Against BHop I would not be surprised to see Slappy Joe's connect rate drop to under 20%!

    Boo
     
  15. MancMexican

    MancMexican Blood & Guts Forever Full Member

    5,152
    0
    Apr 23, 2006
    28% seriously?