Why Salita and not Murray?

Murrays last four fights, whilst a step up from his usual fodder, have not been any better than Salitas standard of opponent. A shop worn and virtually shot Thaxton and an ill Lee Meager both retired straight after facing Murray, JM took longer to finish a game Lawton than Khan did, and McAllister should have pushed the Manc harder but just seemed to be content with ****ing about...its not a sparkling record, and certainly no better than Salitas.

 

the boxrec ranking tells u all u need to know about salita hes outside the top 50

 

Murray is happy shouting his mouth and fighting nobodies. When he takes he step up in his career he may hopefully get the chance to one day sharte a ring with Khan but Murray will probably still be fighting Thaxtons, Lawtons and Meagers in another 28 fights.

I know people like to bash Khan but it is really pathetic.

 

I was there, Murray lost IMO, and also the opinion of the party I was with :deal

 

Then I'm afraid you don't have a point...if the standard of record is similar then the only difference can be top class promotion, and that has got **** all to do with Khan, Warren or Salita....ask the WBA what there criteria is for selecting a mandatory challenger

 

So was Khan.

 

:huh What the **** has boxrec rankings got to do with the WBA?

 

So you want Khan to drop the strap?

 

Where is Murray in the Boxrec rankings

 

This is some funny ****.