Why the Adamek fan dislike of Haye?

I think it's very simple

Adamek fans think he can achieve great things at HW and use Haye as an example of a small man doing well.

Haye fans see this and think it's a joke because they consider their fighter to be vastly superior physically and technically.

Adamek fans see this and become enraged that someone disagrees with them and say something about chins.

it then descends into an increasingly childish argument

 

You gotta be kidding me. Haye is thought to be the best HW since Muhhamad Ali. He is supposed to take Klitskoes out in 2 rounds. Nobody says that about Adamek.

Jean Marc Mormeck is without a doubt a good win on Hayes resume even if old and Adamek's win over Bell is comparable because Bell was old as well but that win over Bell was slighly better because first of all Adamek dominated Bell every minute of the bout and knocked him down, plus Bell knocked Mormeck out and that decision in France was very questionable.

Adamek was outboxed by Cunningham in many rounds but the knock down won him the fight, thats what knockdowns are for and are scored 10-8 for a reason. Haye doesnt have anyone of the caliber of Cunningham on his resume and thats a fact.

 

are you off your tits on drugs? what top 10 heavy has adamek fought. old as **** golota? the one and only heavy he has fought??

 

Both CW champs who moved to HW, huge differences in personality and fan crowds, etc.

I dont believe Ive yet to see one word in print about Adamek from Haye.

Still wish/think Haye shouldve fought Cunningham before going to HW.

 

haye is a better fighter, Is why adamek fans don't like that.

 

Then how do you explain his last "performance", him being KFTO'd by a tomato can and his cherry picking at HW? Theres nothing in his record that tells me he's better.

 

He beat a man who 50 and 1 and held a HW title and was 1 foot taller and 40 kg heavier and he beat him, that was an amazing performance, who was this tomato that Koed carl thomspon?, tomato can come on, the man was a top 200 fighter for 10 years, Look Haye is a very good fighter, I don't have no nation loyalty and just look at ability not attitude or behaviour of the fighter. Haye destroys adamek at hw, Adamek gets hit way to much for a small hw, a small hw needs to fight like haye if he won'ts to beat top 15 guys and adamek just can't fight that way. he is a come forward fighter. and when he starts fighting 230 plus men who can hit big and not old and shot, he will get knocked out.

 

Stopped reading after those two assinine statements. Thanks for making my point, slick.

 

ok, you must be polish or a flat out hater:good

 

I simply see Adamek's resume as better, considering his loss occured to an elite fighter not some journeyman. Adamek doesn't cherrypick and punk out of important fights. Adamek doesn't engage in marathon and stinker performances. Adamek can likely take Haye's punches, can Haye take Adamek's? You must still be bitter about Adamek owning Briggs , twice. :hi:

 

Ok, I'm not with those guys who say Haye robbed Valuev's title, imo he just edged it. But how can you call it an 'amazing performance'?
If that was amazing, 46 yo Evander's performance was out of this world, Ruiz excellent and Chagaev's win the best ever in boxing... which they were not!
Haye showed nothing what we've already seen a couple of times by other fighters, and in exeption of Ruiz without stinking out the place.
Haye can still become a great star, but I give other boxers a bigger shot at that... even Adamek.

 

utter pish hayes cruiser record pisses on adameks and as for heavy its a ****ing old golota not some ****ing contender

as for your reasoning in the loss to chad dawson copared to a "journeyman"

diffrant weights for one and tottaly irrational reasoning

and no addamek cant take hayes punches nor do i think haye can take adameks

 

No, I'm not bitter about adamek beating Briggs twice, I respect adamek and like that way he fights, but he just get hit to much to be a top hw, Haye is just a better fighter at HW, haye will hammer adamek, Carl is not a journeyman, that is flat out disrespect for a very good fighter, anybody who has little knowledge of boxing knows about haye did to giant was only way he could win the fight, he was not going to stand toe to toe with this massive man, he would left the ring on his back, You talk about Cherrypicking whats Estrada, he is no top HW is he, there is a reason he was picked, NO power, look I don't hold that again adamek and his people, they know there fighter and I know how this sport works, risk and reward is determined by money.

 

The win over battle worn Mormeck is the best Haye can boast. Enzo has been exposed over and over again, so that win does not impress me at all. Of course the manner in which you lose and to whom counts. Adamek lost on the cards to an elite fighter. Haye got KO'd by a C level opponent. Haye's loss does more damage to his resume than does Adamek's. What part of that don't you comprehand?

 

And who's more likely to take who's?