Why the change of Perception on JMM?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Cocteau, Sep 24, 2009.


  1. doomeddisciple

    doomeddisciple Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,001
    9
    Jul 19, 2004
    Because this place hosts the most reactionary bunch of biased fans on the interweb.
     
  2. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,693
    29,293
    Jul 26, 2004
    JMM was, and is still good.... what exactly is wrong with having bradley beat him? i truly think that bradley WOULD beat him, along with Holt.

    The Mayweather fight did nothing to change my opinion on this, ive never thought JMM should have fought above 135, and he shouldnt be expected to eather. He should be fighting at 130 and 135... having the best 140lber in the world beating him doesnt say anything about how hes dropped in my estimation.

    IMO, nobody should have thought he could compete at 140 in the first place.... see thats the problem with guys like Pac that can go through 130, 135, 140 and 147 and still be effective, people think everyone should be able to do it. JMM is a great fighter, and should stay at his natural weights where hes more effective. I heard hes going to 140 though and yes, i think thats not good for him as although i think he could beat Urango, i think a fight with torres is very interesting, i think Holt could probably beat him, and id pick bradley over him....

    140 is all wrong for JMM IMO
     
  3. RomperStomper

    RomperStomper Active Member Full Member

    891
    0
    May 25, 2009
    It's not a change of perception JMM is a career featherweight who only fought twice as a lightweight it's very obvious he wont be succesful above lightweight and the way he added so much muscle to his body to give him a shot at welterweight he no longer will be able to go back down to lightweight and be effective thats just my opinion but I won't be surprised if he gets beat by a lesser fighter at lightweight in the coming future.
     
  4. Leonard

    Leonard Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,225
    15
    Sep 19, 2009
    Are there a whole lot in the lower weights you think could beat Marquez? Marquez still dominates these guys. JMM bounces off well from knockdowns. If he shows the same level of resiliency coming off from this loss, then he bounces back to produce more good fights. Just not above 140.
     
  5. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,131
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    That's VERY typical in boxing and can't be changed apprently. Fans get overexcited if a fighter loses or wins. If a fighter wins then NO ONE beats him and if he loses then everyone whops his ass easily. When Hatton lost to Mayweather people had him losing to Lazcano and Malignagg in predictions. Same thing happened to Pac when he lost to Morales, you could mention a corpse vs Pac and people will say corpse by UD, now that he's on a win streat NO ONE beats him. That's normal and typical, shouldn't be strange and you will get used to it soon.

    Whoever shits on Marquez for this loss is IDIOTIC. The man was moving up two weight divisions and he knew that his only hope is to see Mayweather TOO rusty and take him out of there, he knew a "boxing" match wasn't going to go well. No one knew if Mayweather will fight and move like before nor show serious speed. When he did it was apparent JMM had no chance. JMM's pick of opponent was insanely risky especially when all he could rely on is his opponent not performing as he used to, even Mayweather his self didn't know how he will perform till he got in there.

    Marquez gambled, he took a major risk, that's what a true beast does. The man moved up two weight division to go in the ring smaller than none other than Mayweather Jr., even when Mayweather failed to make the catchweight Marquez didn't call it off even though he was a huge underdog and escaping was VERY possible there. In all honesty, for Mayweather to copy what Marquez did he should move to MIDDLEWEIGHT and fight Pavlik/Williams winner, that's how risky it was for Marquez.

    I pick Marquez to dominate 140 if he stays dedicated there as he says he will.
     
  6. jimmie

    jimmie Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,706
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    When has a fighter not been shot or overatted after a loss on ESB ? I remember even when Pac lost to Morales you would have thought he was a clubfighter to hear people talk.
     
  7. GalangK

    GalangK Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,808
    0
    Oct 3, 2004
    Because he lost?

    Fight Fans are fickle bunch.

    When Pac lost to Morales, he was no better than face first brawlers who would lose to the first good boxer with power he meets. No one would have even dared say he would have gone as far as he did today (with a few notable exceptions and I along with a lot of others questioned their sanity).

    Im sure Roy Jones had the same amount of blind support when he was at the top of his game. Once he started losing, a lot of people said he was glass jawed and wouldn't last with certain fighters even in his prime.

    Annoying? You bet it is. but what can you do? That's how fight fans are. Its not like having a team and sticking with it since fighters do not last forever or as long as professional teams so people tend to hang on and dump them a lot easier.
     
  8. Cocteau

    Cocteau Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,506
    0
    May 1, 2009
    It's not so much of the loss. It's more of how he moves in his last fight compare to his former self - it's staggeringly distant.
     
  9. BoxingFanNo1

    BoxingFanNo1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,867
    13
    Jan 20, 2009
    Well put.:good
     
  10. stiga

    stiga Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,654
    0
    May 27, 2009
    yes hatton did fare better than marquez because the power issue...pacman has more power...just watch hatton-pacman match last may 2...hatton that was knock out in the tenth round by mayweather was a tired and weak one trying to catch mayweather...but the hatton that was knock out by pacman was still strong and felt he just hurt pacman with combo just before being bomb out....:deal
     
  11. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    This content is protected
     
  12. Cocteau

    Cocteau Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,506
    0
    May 1, 2009

    thing is, hatton didn't really get to show much of what he has in the fight with Pacquiao.
     
  13. dmille

    dmille We knew, about Tszyu, before you. Full Member

    2,270
    71
    Aug 1, 2004
    Once JMM is either retired or completely washed-up, it will still take at least five more years to put his career into its proper historical perspective.

    For your consideration, fighters who have won titles at 126 and 135

    Frank Erne
    Tony Canzoneri
    Henry Armstrong
    Alexis Arguello
    Manny Paciaquo
    Juan Manuel Marquez