Why the difference in support..............

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Pac was with TR. But you can cut the revisionist **** to save your boy. I mean, really, how hard is it to accept what DLH did? Does it hurt you or something? DLH laid the challenge, then bailed. And since Cotto was with TP, as was Margarito, he challenged two TR fighters. Pac has nothing to do with this matchup.

 

Revisionist? I'm not revising anything, that's what happened. GBP/TR weren't going to work together and the only reason the Pac fight was able to happen was due to the fact that Pac was freelancing and Oscar had the chance to sign him. and from what i've read GBP still gets a minor cut in Pacquiao's fights

 

i read that that stipulation expired in 2010

 

And yet, DLH challenged the winner, only to bail when it wasn't the one he wanted. Nothing you can say changes that fact Turbo. BTW, that scenario you are talking about, with the briefcase full of cash GBP offered Pac, was way before DLH vs. Pac came about.

 

And so ****ing what?

Maybe he was looking for a bigger payday given he was at the tail end of his career and thought Margorito couldnt bring him that big payday...He was probably banking on Cotto to win. Have that ever crossed your mind??

He fought Pac in which I think is a way better fight that Margorcheato...The only dumb****s that actually thought Oscar ducked Margocheato are his delsusional fans!

 

**** off troll.... Like I said, nothing changes the fact that he challenged THE WINNER. He didn't say he'll only fight Cotto if he wins, he said the winner.So save you're "Maybe..." **** for someone who cares troll...

 

Ah I see. Figured something that like couldn't have carried on forever, it was a bizarre stipulation.

He couldn't get Marg/Cotto so thats why he couldn't fight them with that whole TR/GBP beef.

 

atsch He couldn't get the fight? There's been plenty of TR/GBP fights to suggest this is just a convenient excuse to live in denial.

 

You dont know what happen...All you doing is speculating like the rest of so stop acting like you got some inside info meth head!

I'm a troll because I dont buy into your bull**** theory?:rofl

Oscar has faced way more dangerous fighters and your meth head ass is seriously trying to imply that he's ducked a generic, basic fighter that gets hit a lot and has no skill at all?? Yeah right!:roll:

 

Not when it's the promoter actually fighting.

 

You say this like DLH being the promoter/fighter is was the hold up. Which is nothing but you speculating on the reasons why DLH ducked him. IF that was they case, that sounds better then what DLH came up with..."I can't fight Mexicans anymore...""Fight Wiliams first...."Besides, did DLH even try to make the fight only to have it fail due to promoter animosity? Nope.I know it's a hard pill to swallow, but get over it.

 

Why would he waste everyone's time on trying to make a fight that couldn't be made because of promotional issues?

the same reason why he doesn't waste anyone's time trying to make any other gbp/tr fights- because they won't happen.

 

I'm spreculating? Dude, are you ****in daft? Nothing you say means jack **** compared to when a guy challenges the winner, and they just comes up with bad excuses not to. And no, I don't call you a troll because you disagree with me. I call you a troll because you're an inconsistent **** who is nothing but a waste of time.You haven't refuted ANYTHING about DLH vs. Margarito/Cotto winner. Nothing.

 

You don't know that Turbo. THings were not always as bad with TR/GBP, and as I pointed out, they have worked together when worth it on some fights.