Why the double standards against Patterson?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bokaj, Aug 19, 2018.


  1. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,939
    Nov 21, 2009
    Yes. It is. It is rewriting history to fit your own opinion. Doesn't matter who Floyd fought after Liston, as ampion e disgraced himself with his blantant ducking of the iron of the division.
     
  2. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,939
    Nov 21, 2009
    Great historically accurate post. Kudos
     
  3. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    This content is protected
     
  4. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    And given he was better regarded in the past, thinking of him as terrible would be the rivisionism. But revisionism isn't bad. You need people questioning our understanding. If we weren't willing to be revisionist, we'd still believe stuff like Johnson dived against Willard.
     
  5. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,136
    13,085
    Jan 4, 2008
    If you check the records, I think you will find that he faced all but one (Folley) of N.B.A:s four nr 1 contenders (Jackson, Folley, Ingo and Liston) during his reign.

    So, if anything your statement "Patterson avoided most of the top contenders of his day" is revisionist history. False revisionist history.
     
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,136
    13,085
    Jan 4, 2008
    The "iron" of the division during his reign must surely consist of Ingo and Liston. He defended against both.

    Folley and Machen were good fighters and at least one of them deserved a shot at the title (well, Machen did, it's harder to see what exactly Folley had done to be ranked nr 1 in 1958). But "iron" of the division? Machen was smashed to bits by Ingo and Folley lost to Cooper, whom Ingo had KO'd, and was KO'd by Liston.

    Floyd defended against the ones who had beat Machen and, in Liston's case, Folley. And not by close decisions against aging versions (like Cerdan-Holman Williams), but resounding KO's over peak versions (Ingo-Machen, Liston-Folley). If that is "avoiding the iron of the division", Floyd must have done about as bad job of it as is possible.
     
    Last edited: Aug 20, 2018
    jowcol likes this.
  7. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,223
    11,694
    Sep 21, 2017
    I'll give Wlad the benefit of the doubt for not fighting his brother. Family ties and all
     
    Bokaj likes this.
  8. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,223
    11,694
    Sep 21, 2017
    But didn't they have a rematch clause in the contract? Or are you saying that they should have made extra defenses in those years in addition to each other?
     
  9. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,223
    11,694
    Sep 21, 2017
    I always said that Patterson looked like he could be a math teacher or principal. Or maybe even an insurance salesman or mortician. Although he didn't have the look of a fighter, he was a damn good one.
     
    jowcol and Bokaj like this.
  10. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,223
    11,694
    Sep 21, 2017
    I was just thinking.....Kimbo Slice looked a lot tougher and meaner than Floyd Patterson. Slice had the look and presence of a pro fighter. And to the person who really didn't follow the sport if you asked them who'd win in the ring many would pick Kimbo Slice to easily beat up Floyd Patterson just by look alone.

    But to those of us in the know, we'd see no other logical conclusion than Patterson annihilating Kimbo Slice in a one sided annihilation.
     
    Bokaj likes this.
  11. jowcol

    jowcol Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,333
    838
    Jul 22, 2004
    Cus controlled Floyd until, another poster said, took matters into his own hands.
    Trifecta wins against Machen, Folley, Williams are NOT out of the question, circa 58-62.
    I think his post Liston career speaks for itself!!
     
  12. LD Boxer-Puncher

    LD Boxer-Puncher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,779
    1,178
    May 10, 2017
    Have to agree totally.

    Floyd Patterson creeps into my top 10 all time heavyweights
     
  13. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Agreed...one thing, Machen definitely reached number 1 status at one point either in 57 or 58. I believe he was number 1 heading into the Johansson bout
     
  14. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Not out of the question but would have liked to have seen it! Williams is a very dangerous stylistic matchup
     
    Bokaj likes this.
  15. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,136
    13,085
    Jan 4, 2008
    Ok.