Hey, I'm not unhappy with the decision. I thought Collazo won but its not unreasonable that Berto got the decision.
Berto cleaned out the championship rounds when he was down about 1 or possibly two points. By no means........did ****ing Collazo have the fight in the bag after the 10th. You young and dumb mother****ers need to stop copying off ledermans card. Live and learn a little.
That's not it. I think alot of people would rather be proven right. With the exception of Williams & Cotto, I'm not sold on any of those fighters that you listed. I don't hate them, I just don't think they're the real deal & would like to be proven right
I have no hate for the guy and I had never even heard of him or Colazzo until coming to this forum a couple of weeks ago. This was my first time seeing either of these two guys fight and I don't know the sport like most of the people here, but I hope there is someone better than Berto out there as far as up and coming WWs go. I don't know, maybe there are some subtle nuances that I missed but I was underwhelmed given the hype.
I scored it 114-113 Collazo. But I had an even round that could have gone to either guy and I had the first round 10-8. which the judges didn't as the ref didn't start a count. (If the ropes save a fighter from a KD, then a KD is usually ruled). So if I score the first round 10-9 Collazo and give Berto the even round, the result is 114-113 Berto. So the term 'robbery' has no place here. (The 116-111 score was so far off the mark as to not even deserve comment.) It was a very good fight and both lads deserve respect.