Why the insistence that the USADA do the testing?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rock0052, Dec 25, 2009.


  1. GregDempsey

    GregDempsey Guest


    that could be the reason..but i will say the blood taken is very small..like a teaspoon..im sure even manny pac gets some bloody noses in sparring...if he does, i would say he loses more blood then that from any nose bleed.
     
  2. SoxNation

    SoxNation Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,231
    0
    Oct 21, 2009
    So you'd be willing to lose 40 million dollars and risk destroying your reputation because of this? That's a worthless excuse and you know it. A few minutes of your time won't disrupt anything. Pacquiao did say he was willing to take random urine tests, but wouldn't that disrupt his training as well?
     
  3. Xavier

    Xavier Boxing Logician Full Member

    1,260
    3
    Aug 15, 2008


    The question then is; has WADA developed adequate testing measures to detect HGH in the bloodstream (from blood testing) as opposed to urine testing?


    I seem to remember 3rdIslander's posts. He's the closest thing we have to a proper expert on these forums, and he said that you can test for HGH from urine (I can't remember whether he said it was HGH itself or substances released during the metabolic pathways of HGH from body -> urine).


    Which would sort of make all this rubbish about thorough testing a moot point, really. The only thing I can see wrong with urine testing from that point on would be that maybe Manny uses someone else's **** sample/tampers with it (as possibly does May, let's not forget). So they'd have to ensure, ahem, the validity of the sample :****.
     
  4. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    The beauty of the one year old article is that we have the entire year since it was published to see if they've genuinely made enough improvements to catch someone and review the organization's test performance.

    They still haven't. If interviewed right now, the exact same "we haven't caught anyone, but we're hopeful" line would be repeated the same way it has been for years now.

    Nobody was caught with their test in 2009, either- going by that quote, the gentlemen interviewed would lead you to believe that was only possible if everyone stopped taking HGH. I'm not going to insult anyone's intelligence like that any more than to say there's no "fear factor" to get all the HGH users to quit taking it with no positive tests to put that fear in them. His organization is currently powerless to stop widespread athletic HGH use, but he's spinning their lack of testing effectiveness into a positive by saying that no positive tests means nobody's on it.
     
  5. lobk

    lobk Original ESB Member Full Member

    29,208
    18,624
    Jul 19, 2004
    Why is it people keeps on bringing up the millions? Can people not grasp that their are boxers out there that are filthy rich already and money is not what drives them? Pac wants to fight and not just fight but win. He doesn't want anything distracting him from his training to achieve this. He has conceded to the test but doesn't want the intrusive blood work to interfere with his preparation. The same intrusive test that every major professional sports in the US have refuse to take.
     
  6. GregDempsey

    GregDempsey Guest


    well other testing agencies are no better...i would say the best thing would be urine and blood tests... "which i think olympic style testing does anyhow?
     
  7. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    Urine tests are vastly different from blood tests.
    I have had a ton of blood tests when I was in the navy, your diet and actions for that day are altered.
    I have seen people faint from giving a vile of blood in boot camp and in the medical clinics.
    Urine is expelled naturally, blood is drawn unnaturally.
    I have seen grown men act like girls when getting blood drawn. Grown men with tattoos.
     
  8. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006

    And I would argue, no worse.

    Which leads me back to my original question: With no bulletproof leader in this field, why is Mayweather's camp so dead-set on this one testing organization and refusing to negotiate on a testing agency both camps can agree on?
     
  9. GregDempsey

    GregDempsey Guest

    well i think it is the best possible...and lets say...just say..pac is on steroids..even if his team could still cycle around the Olympic tests, it would be harder..and he would most likely have to use less banned substance, and have more time off from them...
     
  10. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    You truly underestimate the drug testing in the olyimpics, and modern medicine. Unless you are some sort of scientist, you really don't know shite other than posting someone elses opinion on this matter. Sorry, but if I think that my opponent is on something...I have every right to negotiate that the both of us undergo testing to make sure that neither of us has any physical advantages... Floyd never suspected any of his opponents of cheating except PAc, and that's why he asked for that type of test...
     
  11. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Are you a PAc fan?
     
  12. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    I like both fighters, but I definitely prefer the guy willing to fight.
    I have followed Floyd and Manny for years, I watch both of them every time they fight.
     
  13. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    That's a fair point there, especially if Pac were on an illegal substance and it was able to be tested for.

    Would you agree that those who are already assuming Pac's on something and is skirting the commission's testing because of either good timing or untraceable substances could simply ignore the negative testing from USADA/WADA on the same grounds?

    The big reason I've taken the stance I have on this issue is that it's a slippery slope once people begin to say passing the test in front of him isn't good enough. Well, with no perfect testing system in place, no test is going to be foolproof enough for those questions to ever go away- and even the USADA testing has enough holes in it for people to still not give Pac the benefit of the doubt once he passes it. It seems like the issue has somehow boiled down to "horrible testing method, perfect testing method" in describing NSAC vs USADA, but I have a strange feeling that even passing the more stringent test won't shut people up at all because of its own loopholes.
     
  14. SoxNation

    SoxNation Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,231
    0
    Oct 21, 2009
    I know both test are different, as I have had both on multiple occasions. Did you see the video of Pacquiao getting a blood test that was posted on this site? What about all the tattoos he has? I doubt blood test bother him too much. Blood is also drawn unnaturally in boxing matches and that never bothered Pacquiao either. He should just take the random tests if he's clean.
     
  15. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Willing to fight lol... Both are willing to fight only one is not agreeing with the method of testing, and when the testing should be done. Both want to make in excess of up to 20-30 mil so don't give me that bull about which one YOU think is willing to fight. I'd fight Floyd or Pac for a new pair of Wally's lol...