Why the Klitschkos ducked Valuev

This thread makes 0 sense, so Vitali lost to Lewis and Byrd, one small, one big fighter and that implies that he struggles with bigger opponents?

 

they would have a little advantage.

 

Jack has an hateful obsession with the Klitschkos, similar to Mark David Chapman's obsession with John Lennon.

Jack needs some psychiatric treatment before he ends up doing something that will get him locked up for the rest of his life.

 

They're all British??:smoke

 

:good It's about time someone used hardcore logic here. SNV is the GOAT. The Klitschkos are just holding his belts. Too bad he had to retire undefeated. There just weren't any more real challengers out there willing to fight him.

This content is protected

 

Bingo!

I was bit embarrassed when reading these replies but most of them propably does not have a clue how twisted Jack's mind is.

It is just Jack tend to forget that there are good big guys, decent big guys and very good big guys... Huge Size per se is not advantage but when there is skills behind it and ability to use that size as advantage..

Lets forget about Klitschko with their size advantage. and Think about Lewis for example, Jack's favourite Boxer. Lewis would not exist as hw champion if he was not bigger than lets say Holyfield when they fought.

guys like Lewis, and Klitschkos are perfect examples of skilled big guys who did use their size to intimidate their opponents.

I dont know Bchump.. It really is bit that way like good big guy tend to beat good small guy...

 

so imposing

This content is protected

 

That is still ******ed.

Like you.