Why The outrage over floyd giving rematches?????

Shut up *****.

 

People cared for and wanted those rematches. Big difference there.

For someone with 5 Masters Degrees as you claim to possess, you sure aren't very eloquent in your speech.

 

1. People wanted to see Pacquiao face Morales a third time (they were 1-1 and a 3rd match was needed to settle the score)

2. People were upset over Pacquiao-Barrera 2, since Marquez was more deserving. But for years, Pacquiao-Barrera 2 was a fight many wanted to see.

3. Nobody cares about De La Hoya II or especially Hatton II

4. Who cares whether or not he's going to get paid?

 

Void is as fake as WWF, get it?

 

3A. Hatton I was a ridiculous circus and throwaway fight that outraged many people in the first place...

 

I have no quarrels with PBF-DLH II, if only PBF had some p4p fighter in sight - ie Cotto. The first match was close, and DLH will probably use his hooks more now, and make Floyd cry...

 

For someone with 5 Masters degrees you sure suck at spelling, and such an ironic word you happened to misspell.

 

I like rematches. But Floyd is too inactive to give rematches. If he was more active i would respect him alot for giving rematches. Especially if he fights Hatton in England at 140, mad props.

 

:rofl

 

ouch

 

well i think because the DLH fight was boring and its not like this time he's going to stand toe to toe with him. Hatton on the other hand was outclass by floyd, plus he's never successful at 147. People would want floyd to fight someone from his division. Specifically cotto

 

atsch