Why this is the Worst decision of all time/

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JohnAnthony, Jun 10, 2012.


  1. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010
    How can you win a boxing match when:

    You land less punches in 10 of the 12 rounds.
    You get out landed almost 2 to 1 in the whole fight in powershots.
    You barely land an eyecatching punch all fight.
    You get stunned and nearly knocked down 4 rounds of the fight.
    You fight most of the fight going backwards.


    Other robberies in the past like oscar vs tito or whitaker vs chavez you could argue that the fighter robbed was retreating too much.

    Or in other fights like marquez Pac 3 you could argue that even though you landed the more eyecatching shots you did get landed overall.

    But this One. Round by Round Manny landed more shots, more power shots, more eyecatching shots, was the aggressor, stunned bradley on numerous occasions.


    That's why not a single part of me can see how Bradley won.

    I'd rank this worse than Lewis Holyfield 1.
     
  2. errsta

    errsta Boxing Addict banned

    6,321
    1
    Jul 31, 2004
  3. Archer

    Archer Guest

    and new welterweight champion of the world

    This content is protected
     
  4. platnumpapi

    platnumpapi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,212
    4
    Jun 10, 2005
    bradley has none of the following

    defense
    speed
    heart
    chin
    workrate
    real foot work
    crafty
    real ring iq
    defense
    boxing ability

    complete fighter !!!

    all i know is if half the **** *******s said about this fight was true the fight would not have went passed 6 rds.**** the robbery pacman was supposed to destroy this kid wtf happen to that part.nobody want to talk about that though, just want to ***** about a robbery.anything can happen when you leave it in the hands of the judges, WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ?
    WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ?

    thats for ever thready about a robbery.in fact im making a thread with this on it for one page

    WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ? WHY WAS IT LEFT IN THE HANDS OF THE JUDGES ?
     
  5. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010

    :rofl
     
  6. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010

    my thoughta were watching it. was it only went to the decision because went into retreat mode like Cotto and Mosley. And its not to tricky for a good fighter who can fight off the back food to go the distance with manny, cos he struggles to close the distance.

    and thats why he couldnt finish the fight
     
  7. Chairman

    Chairman Active Member Full Member

    514
    0
    Jun 3, 2012
    Maybe Ashton Kutcher is pulling the biggest punk'd episode ever.
     
  8. platnumpapi

    platnumpapi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,212
    4
    Jun 10, 2005
    naw thats was not the word on the street last night.tim went toe to toe with pacman.pacman felt his power as well and thought to himself damn what will it take to beat this guy.tim tasted the power and wanted more but he did not run the last rd or the one before that.bum ass lederman even gave tim the last 2rds and he would not have done that with pacman moving forward and tim going backwards.watch the fight again until you see it my way which is the more accuate way from a boxing standpoint. not nut hugging and fake punches landed like lampley.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,137
    Mar 21, 2007
    Worst decision since Casamayor-Santa Cruz IMO.
     
  10. StreetsofRAGE

    StreetsofRAGE Ballin Full Member

    4,603
    0
    Feb 3, 2010
    :bart Pacquiao - Marquez III was much worse.

    Pac had this **** coming.

    Also, this was a close fight and Bradley won it close. No big deal.
     
  11. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    12,229
    4
    Dec 12, 2010
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHOf3s70w-c[/ame]
     
  12. stocks

    stocks Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,558
    0
    Aug 19, 2010
    WHAT?

    That was a close fight this wasn't.

    You nuts