:deal Tyson was an awesome fighter. But the thread is not about that. He is quite clearly NOT a nice guy. He deserves exactly 0 respect as a man in my book.
Exactly!:yep Sometimes, People see what they want to see even if all the evidence says otherwise.:good
I'm not ignoring the fact that Tyson comes on too strong to woman. He is a wife beater(which most fighter's are), and he has mental issues. But he did not get a fair trial at all, that's what I'm defending. Not the fact that I think he's innocent. You are ignoring the fact that it was not brought up that she falsely accused a man of **** before and the fact that he had a tax attorney as his lawayer. He may have done it, hell I think Rubin"Hurricane" Carter was guilty and especially O.J Simpson. But I am not naive I know that all the evidence was put out there and they were ruled innocent. In the Mike Tyson trial, not all the evidence was brought up in court and he was found guilty. That's not fair.
wah wah mike's a mean old terrible guy wah wah. that was the shakiest evidence ever in a **** conviction and is there really any evidence that mike beat on women (aside from robin the attention *****'s own allegations)? does anyone really think the mega rich and successful tyson would have to '****' that beuty pagent ho? i mean from the the limo driver's account she was into whatever was going on and went up to his room around 3 am. plus mike's second wife (dr. monica or whatever) has stuck by him (tho divorced) and hasn't alleged abuse as far as i know. plus we are talking about fighters, guys who dish out and must take a lot of physical punishment (not to mention shots to the head)... the supreme "alpha male" sport if you will. i'm sure there aren't too many quality fighters who don't have some pretty significant flaws.
Any man who hits a woman, even a ****ing witch like Robin Givens, is a piece of **** and not a nice guy. That's without even going near all the **** bull****.
He just got a lot of bad press. He needed a publicity agent, and he didn't have one. With the right spin doctor, he could have won citizen of the year, several years running.
No i made my judgement on the balance of probability. He was convicted in a court of law of ****. And, separately, assault. He also bit a portion of a man's ear off. He also bit Lewis's thigh in a weigh in brawl. Not to mention the allegations of hitting women. Now i accept that he could be the "unwitting victim" of scams concocted by money grabbing bitches. And even if that IS the case, i still think that the balance of evidence points to him not being a very nice person. In fact i think he is a ****ing thug. I also think that if you took his bollocks out of your face for 2 minutes you would see it too. But youre too much of a deluded fanboy to see the ****ing truth.
Oh this is gold Now listen up, Doris. Yet again you are making some sweeping assumption that im some sort of media *****. With **** all evidence. Claiming subjectivity of the term "nice" is ****ing hilarious after conceding he may be a thug with a temper. That takes the ****ing biscuit. You really are clutching at straws here pal. Dont tell me, Ted Bundy was just a big cuddly bear too, wasnt he? Hitler? A gent? You have revealed yourself to be a ****** of epic proportions. Congratulations. Im sure your mother is very proud.
listen i think alot of people are getting off on saying stuff like he is animal etc i think he is a nice guy with a bad temper... the **** case was a joke, yes we all know that when a girl comes to a guy place at 3 am...she just wants to talk about her family...and ofcourse no one heard her scream or anything.... i find in this case that alot of people just assume that the guy is at fault... and yes he beat up those 2 guys...and we know no other boxers ever beat up people lol
he's always been a jekyll and hyde person. hence the reason he takes his happy pills. :yep over the last few yrs he seems to have grown up a lot though. :thumbsup