well ray never was on a lay off he was always trim he would be doing road work after the comacho fight. he was a guy opsesed on being in shape which helps alot same with delahoya
hell yeah. I watched Terry in his fight with Jackson before he got blown out but I thought damn that boy is fast! He give anyone trouble. Then one night about a year and half later I heard that Ray leonard signed to fight him and that's when I knew Ray was going to be in for some trouble thinking Ray shouldn't fight him. I actually thought ray should have retired after the Hagler fight. I knew what was up with him when he came out in '86-we all remember his publicity stunt trying to get Marvin in the ring and that after that fight, Ray wouldn't take the option to make a defense. But he just kept on fighting which makes what you said earlier legit-that he was picking his opponents at the right time waiting for them to soften like a vulture waiting for its prey to die lest it give scratch out an eye while it's doing its pecking. I have to give him credit for taking the Norris fight tho-kind of like giving an F student points for showing up to class. It was a nice change from his previous act. Good points West. :good
obviously this is the first time you've met redrooster. Ill make an sat analogy for you all Carlito is to Floyd Mayweather as... Redrooster is to Ray Leonard
ok case closed, he is just biased , i can't hate a biased guy.. The fact he rated Ray on the Norris fight tells me that already.. poor ******* has to live with having a swayed mind..
^ It's always easier to agree on something that's to our liking than to acknowledge a painful truth. (see post#31)
red rooster says why was ray leonard so overrated ? Bill Butcher says hagler, hearns, duran & benitez, you silly boy.
Where do you get this crap information from? This is the same nonsense you were spewing in the Classic Forum. I'd used to this with Rooster because I find his Ray-bashing slightly entertaining, but this is crap. Duran had been fighting @ welterweight for two and a half years before he fought Leonard, and even dominated a world class welterweight (and future HOFer) in Carlos Palomino a year earlier. Hearns was never as consistent at stopping guys than he was as a welterweight. Sure quality of opposition also played a factor, but Hearns's power above 147 for awhile was a question mark. It was after a decision win over Minchillo when Tommy said to Manny in the locker room "it's back" while looking at his right hand, referring to the power and stability of his often injured hand. Then came the Duran massacre when it was clear Tommy still had murderous power above 147. Furthermore, how do you sit on a belt and run for the high hills when it took a grand total of one year for the unification bout to materialize? Hearns beat Pipino in August 1980. Leonard's two bouts with Duran were in June and November 1980. Unless you count that neverending time period of TEN MONTHS post-No Mas until SRL-Hearns 1.
Rooster's got knowledge, it's just that he uses it to distort everything into something anti-Leonard.
Are you that insecure about your opinion that you need convince us all? Think Ray is overrated? Each to their own I suppose. He won a gold medal, defeated some ATG's and he has won titles at 5 different weight divisions. That is enough for me to consider Sugar Ray Leonard as one of the greatest fighters of our time. :hi:
It has to do with acceptance and Ray isn't accepted because he wasn't good enough, wasn't dominant the way Roy Jones was. Every judgement I make is based upon logic, not emotion. Who hasn't won a gold medal. Henry Tillman won a medal. Leon Spinks won a medal. Even Breland won a medal but wasn't **** as a pro. Mark had too many frailties and was an accident waiting to happen which is what happend in the Aaron Davis fight when they carted him off in the ambulance. The best fighter to ever come out of the olympics in my opinion was Roy Jones. He didn't make an impression on me in the amateurs but defied description even early as a pro. I don't buy into leonard winning 5 titles that's garbage winning two titles in one day. Why try to hide it? We all know it was a farce that only put him under more scrutiny and criticism. You can't possibly think anyone is simpleminded enough to think he won five titles so why even bring it up? No defenses of his titles except at 147 losing it early. I know Duran was tough but Ray was bigger than him and younger. His win over Hagler could easily have gone against him-I think Hagler edged him. I really don't care what the judges said so even the third title is in question. I just don't think Ray has enough of a career or accomplishments to boast of. So I can justifiably say that he was a pretty good fighter.
Yeah logic . . . logic my ass. :yep Ray isn't accepted? By who? :think Check the International Boxing Hall of Fame website before you open your big mouth moron. :hey :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl