First, I ask this not to flame or talk ****- it's an honest question about a fighter who I respect and have been a fan of for years. What I want to know is how the hell did Roy go from prime to shot so quickly? He took minimal punishment for his entire career going into Tarver 1, yet at that point, you could tell something wasn't the same despite him just winning Ruiz's heavyweight strap in his prior fight and eking out the decision against Tarver. It's been a downhill slide ever since that doesn't need to be documented in detail here. Was losing the weight (only 10 lbs or so over his usual in-ring weight) the culprit? I know losing too much can be catastrophic in terms of overall physical condition because you're cutting out muscle as well, but could that small amount of weight have been his undoing? Fighting fighters who would've been tougher all-around matchups (from a physical, mental, and style standpoint) than most of his earlier opposition, most of whom were already beaten before the fight started because of Roy's mystique, perhaps? Was most of it mental? It really seemed that as time went on, Roy fought more and more cautiously to protect himself, eventually to the point where it was legitimately compromising his ability to win. Did his lack of fundamental prowess (Roy could always do the "wrong" thing and make it turn out right) mean he was destined for that kind of fall at the first sign of physical erosion? Or, was it just a combination of these or other factors? Interested to see your feedback. :thumbsup
Before anyone starts this is not my full opinion but has anyone thought that not taking steroids might have affected him, he out of all boxers bar holyfield is a prime candidate for steroid abuse and was even found to have traces of certasin hormones/steroids after the hall fight i think.
All mental imo, he lost that self confidence that all great champions have, started doubting himself and his ability to take a punch. If you think about it he was always very wary of getting tagged and the Tarver knockout must have reinforced that even more!
He had begun to deteriorate by around 2002, but by that time was admittedly facing lesser opposition and therefore it wasn't really showing substantially. The move up to face Ruiz and the weight draining needed to make his way back down quickened the process greatly, and by the time he faced Tarver it was now apparent to all that he was slowing down. In the second fight with Tarver, his slowing reflexes allowed him to get caught with a huge punch that he was unable to take, and that more or less shattered his confidence, not to mention continued to quicken the deterioration process. The Glenn Johnson fight proved that he was now a shell of his former self, and afterwards he's only slowed further. That was 4 years ago, and people still like to think the Calzaghe fight meant anything.
It's a possibility, but not for the reasons you may think- alot of people can take steroids responsibly without major adverse effects, but you lose the benefit once you stop taking them. If Roy quit using to cut back down to 175, that could very well explain part of it. I think Clubber Lang made a good point with the mental part, as well- I've noticed the same thing he did as far as Roy's wariness to take a shot, even if it meant cutting his own output to do it.
Appreciate the input Sweet Pea...I'll have to check out the Woods fight again since I haven't seen it in years to see if it's noticeable there.
shane mosley also super quick and athletic had taken steroids, these are things that have to be looked at. I can't say as i don't know but couldn't some of this super speed etc have been down to steroids.
it isn't noticeable in the woods fight anyway as woods is slow as ****, this curent roy jones would still look prime in speed compared to woods.
From what I understand, that was only proven after one fight, against Richard Hall, to which Jones claims supplements. I don't know. I've never put much merit into those claims because he proved himself just as effective a fighter, and even moreso earlier in his career, without them. If he was indeed taking them often (which there is no proof of at all) around that point of his career then it's possible they effected him negatively once off them, but I'm not willing to place any faith in that. I don't believe it at all really.