Why wasn,t benitez mentioned with the big four?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by jsimon, May 24, 2008.


Page 2 of 2
  1. fitzgeraldz

    fitzgeraldz And the new Full Member

    21,873
    3
    Feb 27, 2008
    You're not from cupey alto ... quit fronting ...
     
    fitzgeraldz, May 24, 2008
    fitzgeraldz, May 24, 2008
    #16
  2. Bslice

    Bslice Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,044
    5
    Sep 11, 2007
    I mean they could make it the fab 5 or some variation of that
     
    Bslice, May 24, 2008
    Bslice, May 24, 2008
    #17
  3. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    Yes I am fool.......
     
    Orishaman, May 24, 2008
    Orishaman, May 24, 2008
    #18
  4. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,456
    Jan 6, 2007
    Similar Alternative History projections:

    Original Big Five:

    Cuevas, Leonard, Benetiz, Hearns & Duran (Hagler was the MW Champ)

    Cuevas loses to Hearns, & Duran (Leonard "avoids" Cuevas)

    Duran beats Leonard 1, Cuevas (Palomino too)....loses to Hearns, Benetiz, & SRL #2 & 3

    Benetiz beats Duran & loses to Hearns & SRL

    Leonard beats Benetiz, Hearns, & Duran 2 & 3, loses to Duran 1, avoids Cuevas.

    Hearns beats Duran & Cuevas, & Benetiz loses (& draws) with SRL

    The Hagler series of fights were smaller men (Hearns, Leonard & Duran)
    having the huevos to try to move up and beat an established, larger MW champ. (brought to you by Bob Arum) Hagler goes 2-1.
     
    Longhhorn71, May 24, 2008
    Longhhorn71, May 24, 2008
    #19
  5. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    You hit the nail :D
     
    PATSYS, May 25, 2008
    PATSYS, May 25, 2008
    #20
Page 2 of 2