Why wasnt Mayweather vs Castillo 2 such a big fight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Suga, May 22, 2010.


  1. Suga

    Suga Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,731
    1
    May 2, 2010
    I remember it like being an undercard fight for some heavyweight fight, I think it was one of the Klitschko´s. The first fight was very good, so why didnt they make such a big deal out of the second fight?
     
  2. hallelujahholla

    hallelujahholla Original Gangsta Full Member

    896
    0
    Jan 5, 2008
    they should have...considering Castillo was robbed in the first fight
     
  3. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    The fight wouldn't sell plain and simple. Neither Castillo nor Mayweather generated enough star power to sell a big pay-per-view. It was on he undercard of Wlad Klitschko - McCline by the way. One of the worst HBO cards I've ever seen.
     
  4. Suga

    Suga Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,731
    1
    May 2, 2010
    Mayweather back then, wasnt a bigger draw than Wlad kltischko? :shock:
     
  5. Suga

    Suga Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,731
    1
    May 2, 2010
    The scores were definately biased, both could have gotten the decision, a bit sad Castillo didnt get it, but as far as I remember Mayweather won like 5 out of the first 6 rounds.
     
  6. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    After the first fight I remember the commentators gushing all over how the rematch was pay-per-view worthy. Lampley and Merchant don't make the HBO broadcasting decisions so in the end the network put the fight on the undercard of a lesser heavyweight fight.
     
  7. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    No, he wasn't. How long have you been watching this sport?

    Everybody knows that Mayweather didn't get the name he has now till he beat Gatti.
     
  8. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    Name me a lightweight who is. It takes a special dynamic for a little guy to draw more than a heavy.
     
  9. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    I'm guessing since December 2007 - Mayweather-Hatton.
     
  10. Suga

    Suga Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,731
    1
    May 2, 2010
    Yeah exactly, thats why I was very surprised today when I watched the second fight again, and realized that it was the undercard of a Kltschko fight.
     
  11. Suga

    Suga Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,731
    1
    May 2, 2010
    Well Im only 19 years old, and have been watching boxing for a very long time. But when you live in Denmark, there are no American boxing fights on tv except if it was a Mike tyson or Oscar de la hoya.
     
  12. Suga

    Suga Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,731
    1
    May 2, 2010
    Mike Tyson vs Lennox lewis 2002 :)
     
  13. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    Neither guy was much of a name, man. Lamps and Merchant just highly over-estimated the drawing power of those two fghters. The first fight wasn't exactly 'Fight of the Year' potenial either. Good thing they didn't stick that horrendously boring rematch on a pay-per-view. If I want to see a black guy run around for 36 minutes I'll just watch one of those Kenyans run a marathon.
     
  14. fytelod

    fytelod Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,310
    1
    Nov 17, 2009
    No Pacquiao fights in Denmark? ;)
     
  15. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    That fight damn near brought a tear to my eye. :cry: